Unfair Dismissal Payouts in Australia: Navigating High Income Thresholds

Contents

Unfair dismissal claims can be a tricky area of employment law – especially when it comes to calculating an appropriate payout if a claim is successful. In Australia, a key factor in these claims is the high income threshold. As of 1 July 2023, this threshold has been set at $167,500, up from $162,000 for dismissals prior to 30 June 2023. This adjustment plays a crucial role in determining whether an employee can pursue an unfair dismissal claim through the Fair Work Commission.

What is an Unfair Dismissal Payout?

An unfair dismissal payout is the financial remedy awarded to an employee whose termination is found to be unjustified by the Fair Work Commission. If a claim is successful, the outcomes may include reinstatement to their former role or the payment of compensation, which could cover lost wages, entitlements, and sometimes even legal costs incurred by the employer during the dispute. For many employees, understanding how these payouts are calculated is critical for knowing their rights and deciding whether to pursue a claim.

The High Income Threshold: A Key Factor in Unfair Dismissal Claims

The high income threshold is integral to the unfair dismissal framework in Australia. Essentially, it helps determine which employees can bring a claim. If an employee’s annual earnings exceed the set threshold of $167,500, they are generally not eligible to claim unfair dismissal—unless they are specifically covered by a modern award or an enterprise agreement.

This threshold is designed to limit claims from high-earning employees who might have more bargaining power or different avenues to resolve disputes. However, if you are covered by a modern award, the basic earnings test may not apply in the same way. For a deeper insight into how awards impact your claims, you might find our article on modern awards very useful.

Eligibility Criteria for Unfair Dismissal Claims

Continuous Service Requirements

One of the fundamental criteria for bringing an unfair dismissal claim is the requirement for continuous service. Generally, employees must have worked continuously for six months with their employer. However, for employees working in a small business, this period increases to twelve months. This stipulation is designed to ensure that claims come only from individuals with a sufficient working history to establish an employment relationship.

Earnings and Award Coverage

Another key factor affecting eligibility is the employee’s earnings. For those not covered by a modern award or an enterprise agreement, simply earning less than the high income threshold is a requirement. In other words, if your annual earnings are below $167,500, you are generally eligible to lodge an unfair dismissal claim if your dismissal is found to be unjust.

It’s also important to understand that the calculation of earnings isn’t limited solely to base salary. For instance, when determining eligibility:

Wages/Salary: This is usually the primary source of income.
Voluntary Superannuation Contributions: These are contributions made at the direction of the employee.
Non-Monetary Benefits: If these benefits have an agreed monetary value – such as the personal use of a company vehicle – they must be factored in.

Conversely, you should note that:

Mandatory superannuation contributions are not included.
Overtime estimates and non-guaranteed bonuses are excluded unless they are regularly received and clearly quantifiable.
Expense reimbursements, unless they form part of the agreed remuneration package, are also not counted.

Calculation of Earnings for the High Income Threshold

Correctly calculating earnings for the purposes of the high income threshold is essential. Misinterpretations can lead to confusion about eligibility.

When you crunch the numbers, include only those forms of income that are guaranteed. For instance, while your base salary and regular voluntary super contributions are straightforward, non-monetary benefits must be carefully evaluated. If your employment contract specifies a monetary value for any fringe benefit, then that must be added into your annual earnings.

The following are typically included in the earnings calculation:

Base salary or wage – this is your fixed, recurring income.
Voluntary superannuation contributions – contributions made by choice, not by statutory obligation.
Monetised non-monetary benefits – benefits that have an express monetary equivalence.

On the other hand, exclusions such as mandatory super, variable overtime, and non-guaranteed incentives ensure that only steady, predictable payments are considered. This precise method of calculation ensures fairness and clarity in determining who can pursue an unfair dismissal claim.

Impact on Unfair Dismissal Payouts

For employees who do fall within the eligibility criteria, a successful unfair dismissal claim can have significant implications. Not only could the employee receive direct compensation for lost wages, but they may also be entitled to remedies designed to restore their position. These remedies typically include:

Reinstatement into their former position or a comparable role.
Back-payment of wages and entitlements for the period between dismissal and reinstatement or settlement.
Reimbursement of legal costs incurred by the employer when defending against a claim.

However, it is important for both employers and employees to recognise that complex factors – including the calculation of earnings relative to the high income threshold – play a role in determining the final outcome of any claim.

Steps Employers and Employees Can Take

For Employers, it is crucial to:

Ensure that your employment contracts are robust and clearly outline termination procedures. For example, understanding the importance of an employment contract can help set clear expectations and reduce litigation risk.
Implement detailed policies regarding performance management and state-based termination procedures.
Keep meticulous records regarding disciplinary processes, performance reviews, and any communications relating to dismissal. This can be invaluable if a claim is brought.

For Employees, consider these strategies:

Thoroughly review your employment contract and any associated enterprise agreement or modern award provisions. This ensures that you are fully aware of your rights and obligations.
Monitor your earnings closely – including any non-monetary benefits – so you can accurately assess your eligibility against the high income threshold.
If you suspect your dismissal may be unfair, seek prompt advice. Understanding the nuances of how earnings are calculated (and what is excluded) is a complex area of law that benefits from professional guidance.

Moreover, understanding the basics of contract law can be essential for both parties. Ensuring that every element of employment – from remuneration to termination – is clearly defined helps prevent disputes that might otherwise lead to an unfair dismissal claim.

Legal Considerations and Compliance

Australian employment law is built around a framework that safeguards both employers and employees. The Fair Work Commission administrates these rules, ensuring that claims are assessed fairly and consistently.

Compliance with these requirements means that employers must provide clear, compliant dismissal processes that respect the stipulated service and earnings criteria. An inadvertent oversight—such as including discretionary overtime in your earnings calculation—could inadvertently render an employee eligible for a claim.

Additionally, disputes sometimes arise from issues that extend beyond straightforward dismissal, such as workplace harassment or discrimination. Addressing these matters through clear policies and having readily accessible internal procedures is essential. For further insights on handling workplace disputes, our coverage on workplace harassment and discrimination provides practical guidance.

Employers should also consider that seeking professional advice during turbulent times can protect the business from prolonged disputes. If you’re unsure of your legal position, using services such as choosing the right legal representation may not only save you time but also reduce your exposure to further legal risk.

Common Misunderstandings About Unfair Dismissal Payouts

There are several misconceptions that can cloud the issue of unfair dismissal payouts. Clearing these up is essential for both employers and employees:

Misconception: Earning a high income automatically disqualifies an employee from pursuing an unfair dismissal claim.
Reality: While employees earning above the set threshold are generally ineligible, coverage through a modern award or enterprise agreement can override this limitation.
Misconception: All forms of earnings (including overtime and bonuses) are counted when determining eligibility.
Reality: Only guaranteed and quantifiable earnings are included in the calculation. Variable payments are commonly excluded, ensuring that only steady income streams are considered.
Misconception: The payout will cover all losses incurred by an unfair dismissal.
Reality: While successful claims may result in reinstatement or compensation for lost wages, the specific outcome depends on the circumstances surrounding the dismissal and the evidence provided.

Strategies for Employers to Mitigate Dismissal Disputes

To reduce the risk of an unfair dismissal claim and the potential for expensive payouts, employers should adopt a proactive approach:

Robust Contract Drafting: Ensure that your employment contracts are clear and thorough. Incorporate well-drafted termination clauses to avoid ambiguity. For more on how to structure these documents, see our guide on contract basics.
Clear Policies and Procedures: Regularly review and update your workplace policies to comply with current legislation. Training staff on company policies and proper conduct can help mitigate misunderstandings.
Accurate Record-Keeping: Keeping comprehensive records – from annual reviews to any disciplinary actions – is vital. Should a claim arise, these records serve as crucial evidence in support of your case.
Early Legal Consultation: Seeking advice early when issues arise can prevent small disputes from escalating. Engaging with a qualified legal professional, such as those available through our legal services for small businesses, is a prudent step.

How Changes to the High Income Threshold Affect Your Business

The adjustment of the high income threshold can have broad implications for both employers and employees. As the threshold increases, a smaller proportion of the workforce may qualify for unfair dismissal claims. This can influence the nature of settlement negotiations and the approach an employer takes to staff terminations.

Employers should be aware that even with a higher threshold, the underlying principles of fairness and due process remain unchanged. This means that dismissals must always be conducted in accordance with company policies, the Fair Work Act, and any relevant industrial instruments.

It is also important to consider that periodic reviews of the threshold may necessitate a review of your company’s dismissal procedures. Regular training for HR personnel and legal advisors can help ensure that your policies are always aligned with the latest legislative requirements.

Real-life Examples and Case Studies

Consider the following scenarios:

Case Study 1: An employee earning just under the threshold was dismissed following a performance dispute. The employee successfully lodged a claim, arguing that the dismissal was procedurally unfair. The Fair Work Commission underscored the importance of clear and consistent performance management practices, and the employer was subsequently required to provide back-pay and a formal apology.
Case Study 2: In another instance, a high-earning employee – technically ineligible for a claim due to exceeding the income threshold – challenged their dismissal on the grounds of being covered by a modern award. The Commission recognised that award coverage altered the eligibility criteria, and the employee received a payout along with a mandate for improved dismissal procedures.

These examples illustrate that while the high income threshold is a critical factor, the specific details of each employment relationship and the manner of dismissal are just as important.

Preparing for an Unfair Dismissal Claim

Preparation is key for both employers and employees. For employers, developing a clear dismissal process and maintaining thorough documentation will go a long way in defending against potential claims. Employees, meanwhile, should keep informed of their rights and regularly review their employment contracts and associated conditions.

If you believe that you are at risk of an unfair dismissal claim – or if your dismissal procedure might be challenged – consider undertaking the following steps:

Review your existing employment contracts. Are all termination clauses and compensation details clearly defined?
Assess whether your business policies comply with the current standards set out by the Fair Work Commission and any applicable modern awards.
Ensure that all employee earnings are accurately documented. This includes verifying the inclusion of only those earnings that are relevant for the high income threshold calculation.
Engage professional legal advice to review your internal processes and contracts – an important resource in mitigating potential disputes.

Employers who are well-prepared and proactive in managing these issues not only reduce their legal risk but also foster a fairer and more transparent workplace environment.

Key Takeaways

The current high income threshold for unfair dismissal claims in Australia is $167,500 as of 1 July 2023.
Eligibility for an unfair dismissal claim depends on continuous service requirements and whether an employee’s earnings are below the threshold, unless they are covered by a modern award or enterprise agreement.
Only guaranteed earnings – such as base salary, voluntary super contributions, and monetised benefits – are considered in calculating eligibility.
Employers should maintain clear and compliant employment contracts and policies to mitigate the risk of claims.
Both employers and employees benefit from seeking early legal advice to navigate the complexities of unfair dismissal and payout calculations.

If you would like a consultation on unfair dismissal payouts, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.

Alex Solo

Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.

Do you need legal help?
Get in touch now!

We'll get back to you within 1 business day.