Put exclusivity terms into a contract that matches the commercial bargain

Exclusivity can sound simple commercially, but it often creates uncertainty unless the restriction is described precisely. A written agreement helps define who is bound, what products or services are affected, whether the exclusivity is full or limited, where it applies and what exceptions exist. It can also deal with what the other party must do in return, such as minimum orders, sales targets, promotion obligations or service standards. Without that detail, parties can end up with very different expectations about the same deal.

Most exclusivity agreements cover the exclusivity promise, duration, territory or channel, any customer or product carve-outs, fees or consideration, confidentiality, intellectual property, liability allocation, termination rights and post-termination consequences. Some also include minimum performance requirements, reporting obligations, milestone triggers or rights to convert the arrangement to non-exclusive if targets are missed. The exact drafting depends on the commercial setup, but the aim is to make the boundaries of the exclusive right clear enough that both sides know what is and is not permitted.

The drafting depends on the structure of the arrangement and what each side is giving up or gaining. An exclusivity clause for a distributor, software reseller, marketing partner or service provider can look quite different because the risks and commercial expectations are different. Useful details include the products or services involved, the territory, whether online sales are included, any protected customer groups, performance commitments, branding rights and the circumstances in which the exclusivity should end. Those details shape whether the restriction is narrow, broad, conditional or staged.

A precedent can be a starting reference, but tailored drafting is usually safer where the document affects customers, staff, suppliers or regulators. However, exclusivity often turns on details that templates leave vague. Common gaps include unclear territory wording, no treatment of existing customers, no carve-out for passive sales, weak underperformance triggers and no practical exit process. A broad clause may also create a restriction that is commercially unrealistic or different from what the parties discussed. If exclusivity is a key part of the deal, it is usually worth checking that the document reflects the actual commercial arrangement rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all form.

That depends on how settled the deal terms already are and whether you need a fresh draft or a review of the other party's document. If the commercial points are clear, the work is usually more straightforward. If territory, performance thresholds, payment mechanics or exit rights are still being negotiated, the drafting can take longer because those points affect the structure of the agreement. Once the draft or review is completed, you can consider any changes needed before signing or before sending revisions back to the other side.

As an online law firm, we eliminate the headaches of paying us by the hour and finding time to meet with a lawyer in person. We charge a fixed fee, with upfront quotes and transparent pricing, and communicate via phone, email and video chat - whichever suits you! You'll be guided through our process by our expert lawyers, who are Australian-qualified and specialise in technology, intellectual property, contract drafting, corporate and commercial law.

At Sprintlaw, our pricing is transparent and designed for startups and small businesses. Many one-off legal services, including document drafting and reviews, are provided for a fixed fee with an upfront quote before you proceed.

Prices typically range from $250 to $2,500 AUD depending on the complexity and scope of the work. For ongoing support, Sprintlaw Memberships include options such as legal templates, consultations, a legal helpline and credits for services.

If your project is larger or more complex, we will provide a tailored quote after understanding what you need.

Our law firm operates completely online, which means we can help you wherever you are in Australia. We work at The Commons Central - a cool co-working space in Chippendale, Sydney - but our lawyers often work flexibly across various locations.

Our lawyers also work from co-working spaces and home offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth, so clients can get help online without needing to meet in person.