Set the rules of your bug bounty program before researchers participate

They help set the legal ground rules before external researchers interact with your systems. That can include who is allowed to participate, what assets are in scope, which testing methods are prohibited, how reports must be submitted, and when a reward may be refused. Without those rules, businesses can run into arguments about unauthorised testing, unclear reward expectations, premature public disclosure or handling of sensitive information found during testing. The legal position also depends on how the program is run in practice, not just what the document says.

These terms commonly deal with participant eligibility, registration requirements, in-scope and out-of-scope systems, prohibited conduct, reporting channels, response process, reward conditions, confidentiality, restrictions on public disclosure, intellectual property treatment for reports or submissions, and liability wording. Some programs also need careful wording around researcher conduct where testing may touch personal information, customer environments or third-party hosted infrastructure. The final terms should match the way your team triages reports and communicates with researchers, rather than relying on broad wording copied from another program.

Key inputs include whether the program is public or invite-only, which products or environments are covered, whether live systems are involved, what testing methods are allowed, whether rewards are fixed or discretionary, and how your internal triage process works. Data handling is often a major issue. The document needs to line up with your actual privacy practices, including how information moves through the business, especially if researchers may encounter personal information, confidential datasets or third-party systems. The factual setup of the program can matter as much as the wording itself.

A template may help you identify common headings, but it often assumes a different legal and operational context. It may not fit your infrastructure, your reward model, your privacy position or the way your team handles vulnerability reports. It can also be too vague on issues like out-of-scope testing, disclosure restrictions, duplicate reports, or what happens if a researcher impacts a third-party environment. A tailored document is usually more useful where your program touches production systems, customer data, hosted services or a detailed internal triage workflow.

It is usually more efficient when you already have the main program settings worked out. Helpful inputs include your proposed testing scope, list of in-scope assets, reporting workflow, reward approach, disclosure position, and any internal guidance your security team plans to follow. If those points are still evolving, the legal terms may need more iteration. Once the relevant details are available, the document can be prepared and refined to reflect the program you actually intend to run. Publishing the program and operationally managing reports are separate steps outside this service.

As an online law firm, we eliminate the headaches of paying us by the hour and finding time to meet with a lawyer in person. We charge a fixed fee, with upfront quotes and transparent pricing, and communicate via phone, email and video chat - whichever suits you! You'll be guided through our process by our expert lawyers, who are Australian-qualified and specialise in technology, intellectual property, contract drafting, corporate and commercial law.

At Sprintlaw, our pricing is transparent and designed for startups and small businesses. Many one-off legal services, including document drafting and reviews, are provided for a fixed fee with an upfront quote before you proceed.

Prices typically range from $250 to $2,500 AUD depending on the complexity and scope of the work. For ongoing support, Sprintlaw Memberships include options such as legal templates, consultations, a legal helpline and credits for services.

If your project is larger or more complex, we will provide a tailored quote after understanding what you need.

Our law firm operates completely online, which means we can help you wherever you are in Australia. We work at The Commons Central - a cool co-working space in Chippendale, Sydney - but our lawyers often work flexibly across various locations.

Our lawyers also work from co-working spaces and home offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth, so clients can get help online without needing to meet in person.