Bella has experience in boutique and large law firms with particular interest in privacy and business law. She is currently studying a double degree in Law and Psychology at Macquarie University.
Even in 2026, COVID-19 hasn’t fully disappeared from Australian workplaces. What has changed is how we manage it: most industries are no longer operating under “one-size-fits-all” public health directions, and many businesses are balancing hybrid work, tighter staffing levels, and evolving work health and safety expectations.
If you employ staff, you’ve probably faced some version of this question: “Can I require an employee to take a COVID test?” Closely followed by: “What do I do if someone shows up coughing, feverish, or clearly unwell?”
The good news is there are practical, legally safer ways to handle flu-like symptoms at work. The key is understanding what you can direct, what you can request, and what you should document so you’re meeting your safety obligations without overstepping into privacy or discrimination issues.
Below, we’ll walk you through how COVID-19 testing directions generally work in Australia, what steps to take when a staff member has symptoms, and how to manage refusals and sensitive information in a fair and compliant way.
Can You Force An Employee To Take A COVID-19 Test In Australia?
In most situations, you can’t literally “force” an employee to do anything. But you may be able to give a direction that requires a COVID-19 test (or other health evidence) if that direction is lawful and reasonable.
That “lawful and reasonable” test is the centre of the analysis. A direction is more likely to be lawful and reasonable when:
- there is a clear work health and safety (WHS) risk you’re trying to manage (for example, close-contact work, high-risk clients, or critical operations);
- the direction is proportionate (for example, asking for a rapid antigen test (RAT) after symptoms or a known exposure, rather than requiring routine daily testing with no trigger);
- you have consulted where required (for example, under WHS consultation obligations, or where consultation is required by a Modern Award, enterprise agreement, or workplace policy);
- there are no less intrusive options that would reasonably manage the risk (like working from home or taking paid personal/carer’s leave); and
- you apply the requirement consistently and fairly (not selectively targeting certain employees).
When A Test Requirement Is More Likely To Be Reasonable
In 2026, COVID testing is often treated similarly to other workplace health controls. That means it’s usually strongest where you can show a genuine operational and safety need.
Examples of workplaces where a test request is more likely to be considered reasonable include:
- healthcare, aged care, disability services, and other high-risk settings;
- roles involving close physical contact with customers or vulnerable people;
- critical services where an outbreak could shut down operations;
- workplaces with previous outbreaks and documented risk controls; and
- situations where an employee has symptoms or has had a known exposure and is seeking to attend work.
When A Blanket “Everyone Must Test” Rule Can Be Riskier
A blanket requirement (for example, requiring all staff to test every day or every week regardless of symptoms, exposure, or risk) can be harder to justify. It may still be possible in some workplaces, but you should expect greater scrutiny around:
- why it’s necessary for your workplace (not just “because COVID exists”);
- how you will manage and protect health information;
- costs and practicalities (including whether you are supplying tests); and
- fairness and exemptions (for example, medical reasons).
From a WHS angle, you still have a duty to provide a safe workplace. That duty doesn’t always require testing, but it does require reasonable controls. In many businesses, those controls will look like “stay home if unwell”, cleaning, ventilation, and flexible work arrangements rather than routine testing.
It’s also worth remembering your duty of care doesn’t end with COVID. Flu, RSV and other infectious illnesses can create similar workplace risks, especially where staff work closely together.
What To Do If An Employee Has Flu-Like Symptoms At Work
When someone shows up visibly unwell, the immediate goal is safety and containment, not “proving” what illness they have.
A practical, legally safer approach is to treat it as a general infectious illness risk and respond consistently.
Step 1: Ask Them To Stop Work And Move Away From Others
If an employee is coughing, feverish, or otherwise showing flu-like symptoms, you can usually direct them to pause work and avoid close contact with others.
Keep your language neutral and factual. For example:
- “You seem unwell today. Let’s step aside so we can work out next steps.”
- “We need to manage the risk of illness spreading at work.”
Step 2: Send Them Home (Or Arrange Work From Home If Appropriate)
In many workplaces, it will be reasonable to direct an unwell employee to go home, particularly if their duties can’t be performed safely or they’re likely to infect others.
If their role can be performed remotely, offering work from home can be a good option. If not, this will usually become a leave conversation (for example, paid personal leave if they are unfit for work and have an entitlement).
Step 3: Decide What Evidence (If Any) You Need
If the employee is taking paid personal leave, you may be entitled to request evidence that would satisfy a reasonable person (often a medical certificate or statutory declaration). The “how” matters here: make sure your request aligns with Fair Work and any applicable Award/enterprise agreement.
If you employ casuals, evidence questions often come up quickly. In that case, it can help to understand the rules around medical certificates and what evidence can be reasonably requested.
Step 4: Consider A COVID Test Request (Only If It’s Relevant)
If the employee has symptoms consistent with COVID-19, you can consider asking them to take a test before returning to work.
The safest way to frame it is as a risk management step tied to returning to the workplace, not as a punishment or a moral judgment. For example:
- “Before you come back on site, we need to be confident you’re not infectious. Are you able to take a RAT today and let us know the result?”
- “If you can’t test, we may need you to remain off site until symptoms resolve or we have other medical clearance.”
If a test is not available or the employee cannot test for a legitimate reason, consider alternatives (like staying home until symptoms resolve, or obtaining clearance from a medical practitioner).
Step 5: Keep Notes (But Don’t Over-Collect Information)
Write down what happened and what directions were given. You generally don’t need to record detailed medical symptoms or personal health history. The aim is to document:
- date/time and who was involved;
- what you observed (briefly);
- what you directed/requested (for example, “sent home due to symptoms”);
- any safety steps taken (like isolating from others); and
- what the employee advised about work capacity (for example, “unable to work, going to seek medical advice”).
Can You Require A Negative Test Or Medical Clearance Before Returning To Work?
Sometimes the better question isn’t “Can I force a test?” but “What am I allowed to ask for before an employee returns to the workplace?”
In many cases, it can be lawful and reasonable to require an employee to provide evidence that they are fit to return to work, especially where:
- they were sent home due to illness symptoms;
- their duties involve close contact with others;
- there is a heightened risk environment (for example, vulnerable clients); or
- you have a documented WHS risk assessment and return-to-work process.
That evidence might be a negative COVID test, or it might be a medical certificate confirming they are fit for work. The best option depends on your workplace and the role.
As a general guide, employers often ask for medical clearance where fitness for work is unclear or where there are safety-critical duties.
Be Careful With “DIY Medical Decisions”
Try not to diagnose, debate, or argue about what illness the employee has. Your role is to manage workplace safety and operational impact. If you need clarity, it’s usually better to ask for appropriate evidence rather than attempting to assess medical issues yourself.
Make Sure Your Request Is Consistent
If you require a negative test from one employee, but not from others with the same risk profile, it can create unnecessary conflict and increase legal risk. Consistency is a big part of what makes a direction “reasonable”.
Privacy And Health Information: What Can You Collect (And How Should You Store It)?
COVID test results and symptom information are forms of personal information, and often sensitive information. Even if your business isn’t covered by all aspects of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), it’s still best practice to handle health information carefully and respectfully.
Only Collect What You Actually Need
A common mistake is collecting more information than necessary, like asking employees to disclose detailed medical history, taking photos of test results, or maintaining informal “health status” spreadsheets.
Instead, focus on what you need to keep your workplace safe. In many workplaces, it’s enough to record:
- whether the employee is fit to attend work; and
- whether there is a relevant infection risk that requires temporary workplace controls.
Tell Employees Why You’re Collecting The Information
One of the simplest ways to reduce misunderstandings is transparency. If you’re collecting test results or related information, you should be clear about:
- what you’re collecting;
- why you need it;
- who will have access; and
- how long you’ll keep it.
This is where having a clear privacy collection notice (or a workplace privacy notice, depending on your setup) can make your process feel fair and predictable.
Limit Access And Store It Securely
As a practical rule, test results and medical evidence should not be accessible to “everyone”. Keep it limited to the people who need to know (often HR, the owner/manager, or a WHS contact).
If you’re storing documents electronically, think about:
- who can access the folder;
- whether you can use role-based permissions;
- whether you have a retention schedule (so you don’t keep sensitive info forever); and
- how you handle accidental disclosure (for example, test results being emailed to the wrong group chat).
If you’re updating your internal messaging and escalation pathways, it can help to align them with your broader workplace communication obligations and expectations.
How To Set Up A Clear Workplace Testing And “Stay Home If Sick” Process
The fastest way to reduce legal risk (and the awkwardness of these conversations) is to have a documented process that employees understand before an issue happens.
In practical terms, you want a system that answers:
- What happens if someone has symptoms at work?
- When do they need to stay home?
- Do they need to test? If yes, when?
- What evidence is required for leave?
- When can they return?
- How do we protect their privacy?
Start With A Simple Risk-Based Rule
Many small businesses do well with a “trigger-based” approach rather than ongoing blanket rules. For example:
- Trigger 1: Employee has flu-like symptoms → do not attend the workplace, notify manager, consider testing, and discuss leave/work from home.
- Trigger 2: Confirmed COVID-19 → follow current public health guidance and internal risk controls before returning on site.
- Trigger 3: Confirmed close contact in a high-risk setting → apply additional controls (for example, remote work, testing, PPE) where reasonably necessary.
Put It In Writing (So It’s Not “Made Up On The Day”)
Even a short workplace policy can go a long way. It helps you apply rules consistently, and it helps employees understand what’s expected.
If your business already has workplace policies (for example, WHS policies or conduct policies), it’s worth checking that your illness/testing process fits neatly within them.
Think About Related Testing Issues (Like Drug And Alcohol Testing)
COVID testing isn’t the only area where employers deal with “testing and privacy” issues. The same core principles apply: necessity, reasonableness, consultation, privacy, and clear documentation.
That’s why it can help to look at how testing directions are treated more generally, including drug testing in the workplace, especially around lawful and reasonable directions and managing sensitive information.
What If An Employee Refuses A COVID Test Or Won’t Leave The Workplace?
This is where things can feel stressful, especially if you’re short-staffed or dealing with a customer-facing environment. The key is to slow down and treat it as a process issue, not an immediate disciplinary issue (unless the conduct is serious).
1) Clarify What You’re Directing (And Why)
First, be clear about the direction. Are you directing them to:
- go home because they appear unfit for work?
- not attend the workplace until symptoms resolve?
- provide evidence (like a negative test) before returning?
Then explain the basis: workplace safety, protecting other staff/customers, and keeping the business operating.
2) Explore Reasonable Alternatives
If the employee refuses to test, it doesn’t automatically mean you have no options. Alternatives might include:
- working from home temporarily;
- adjusted duties to reduce contact (where possible);
- taking personal leave (paid if entitled); or
- medical clearance confirming fitness and infection risk (depending on the situation).
3) If They Refuse To Leave While Unwell
If an employee is clearly unwell and refusing to leave the workplace, you may need to escalate to a formal direction and document it.
Depending on the circumstances, you might also consider whether you can lawfully remove them from duties and, in more serious situations, whether a temporary removal from the workplace is appropriate.
Some employers consider a suspension step where there is a genuine safety risk or refusal to follow directions, but this must be handled carefully. If you’re thinking about this, it’s worth understanding when you can legally suspend an employee and what process safeguards you should follow.
4) Consider Stand Down (But Only In The Right Circumstances)
“Stand down” is often misunderstood. It isn’t a general tool to use whenever someone is sick or there’s a workplace disagreement.
Stand down has specific legal meaning under the Fair Work Act and/or industrial instruments, and whether it applies depends on the reason work can’t be performed (and whether the cause is beyond the employer’s control).
If you’re considering it, it’s important to look at the rules around standing down an employee and get advice that’s tailored to your situation.
5) Avoid Knee-Jerk Termination
Refusal to follow a direction can become a disciplinary issue, but jumping straight to termination is where many employers get into trouble.
Before taking any formal steps, check:
- Was the direction lawful and reasonable in the circumstances?
- Did you communicate it clearly?
- Did you give the employee a genuine chance to respond?
- Are there medical, cultural, or other factors you need to consider?
- Are you acting consistently with your policies, contract, and any Award/enterprise agreement?
If you handle the process carefully, you can usually protect the workplace while keeping things fair and respectful.
Key Takeaways
- You generally can’t “force” a COVID test, but you may be able to direct an employee to test if it is lawful and reasonable for your workplace and the specific circumstances.
- If an employee has flu-like symptoms at work, it’s often reasonable to send them home and manage it as a workplace safety issue rather than trying to diagnose the illness.
- Before requiring a negative test or medical evidence to return, check that your request is proportionate, consistent, and tied to a genuine WHS risk.
- COVID test results and illness information are sensitive, so only collect what you need, explain why you’re collecting it, and store it securely with limited access.
- If an employee refuses testing or refuses to leave the workplace, focus on clear directions, reasonable alternatives, and process fairness before escalating to formal action.
- A written workplace process (symptoms, testing triggers, return-to-work steps, and privacy handling) makes it much easier to apply consistent decisions and reduce disputes.
If you’d like help setting up a legally compliant approach to workplace illness management, testing requests, and return-to-work processes, reach out to Sprintlaw on 1800 730 617 or email team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.








