Embeth is a Senior Lawyer at Sprintlaw. Having previously practised at a commercial litigation firm, Embeth has a deep understanding of commercial law and how to identify the legal needs of businesses.
The gig economy has changed how Australians work, earn and build businesses. Platforms like Uber Eats connect restaurants to customers and couriers at an incredible scale - but they also sit at the centre of big legal questions.
One of the biggest is fairness and job security. When a platform disables a courier’s account, is that an “unfair dismissal”? And if not, what protections exist - and what responsibilities do platforms and partnering small businesses have?
In this guide, we unpack the key issues around Uber Eats, unfair dismissal and where gig work is heading in Australia. Whether you’re a rider, a restaurant using delivery apps, or you’re building a platform yourself, understanding these rules will help you stay compliant and protect your business.
What Counts As Unfair Dismissal In The Gig Economy?
Under Australia’s Fair Work framework, “unfair dismissal” generally applies to employees who are dismissed in a harsh, unjust or unreasonable way. The threshold question is whether the person is an employee or an independent contractor.
Most food delivery couriers in Australia are engaged as independent contractors. That means the traditional unfair dismissal protections that employees have under the Fair Work Act usually don’t apply when a courier’s account is deactivated or “offboarded”.
However, that doesn’t mean there are no legal protections. Contractors may still have rights, including:
- Contractual rights under the Terms of Use or Service Agreement with the platform.
- Protections under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) in relation to unfair contract terms or misleading conduct.
- General protections (e.g. adverse action based on prohibited reasons) depending on the facts and legal status.
- State-based work health and safety protections and road rules that affect how work is done.
The key is classification. If a worker is legally an employee, unfair dismissal rights are more likely to arise. If they are a contractor, other mechanisms (contract law, ACL, dispute resolution processes in the app) tend to be the main avenues.
Are Uber Eats Drivers Employees Or Contractors?
This question drives many high-profile disputes. The answer depends on how the relationship works in practice - not just what the contract says. Courts and tribunals look at factors like control, integration into the business, ability to delegate, provision of equipment, and how payment is structured.
For many delivery apps, couriers set their own hours, use their own vehicles and choose whether to accept jobs. Those features point towards contractor status. That said, the law in this area continues to evolve, and the specifics of each arrangement matter.
If you’re unsure how your arrangement should be classified, it’s prudent to get tailored employee vs contractor advice. Getting this wrong can have real consequences - from liability for back-pay and entitlements to penalties for non-compliance.
For couriers, it’s also important to understand the platform’s onboarding rules. Many platforms require an ABN, proof of right to work, safety standards and vehicle documentation. If you’re just getting started, review the platform’s onboarding steps alongside a quick refresher on Uber Eats driver requirements so you know what’s expected from day one.
Recent Changes And Why This Debate Keeps Evolving
Why does it feel like the rules keep changing? Two reasons. First, courts and commissions continue to refine how they assess employee-like arrangements in digital platforms. Second, governments are actively reviewing gig economy protections, including minimum standards, safety and insurance settings.
Expect the following themes to keep influencing outcomes:
- Contractual clarity: Detailed platform terms can set expectations about account reviews, deactivation grounds and appeal processes. Clear, balanced terms reduce dispute risk.
- Transparency and procedural fairness: If a platform disciplines a courier (e.g. for alleged fraud or safety incidents), transparent processes and evidence are central to defending any challenge.
- Safety and compliance: Delivery work involves road safety, food safety and public liability risks. Platforms and restaurants need policies that prioritise safe practices.
- “Employee-like” protections: Policymakers are exploring minimum standards for certain contractor cohorts. Even if a worker isn’t an employee, new rules may still impose baseline conditions.
The takeaway? Classifications may stay complex, but good documentation, fair processes and proactive compliance are your best defence against disputes.
What Does This Mean For Restaurants And Small Businesses Using Delivery Apps?
If you’re a restaurant or retailer that uses a delivery aggregator, you may not be the courier’s hirer - but you’re still part of the ecosystem. There are legal and reputational risks to consider.
Practical steps if you rely on delivery platforms
- Review your platform agreement: Understand service levels, chargebacks, refunds, branding and data rules, as well as suspension/termination rights on both sides.
- Customer law compliance: Your listings and offers should align with the Australian Consumer Law, particularly around accurate pricing, product descriptions and delivery representations.
- Workplace safety at pickup: Ensure safe pickup areas and clear processes for couriers collecting orders.
- Fair dispute processes: Keep records of any delivery incidents, late orders or alleged misconduct so issues can be resolved with evidence, not assumptions.
- Data and privacy: If you receive customer data via the platform (names, order details), handle it in line with your Privacy Policy and the platform’s rules.
Some businesses also engage their own contractors for in-house delivery. If that’s you, put a clear Contractor Agreement in place and ensure the classification aligns with how work is actually performed.
What If You’re Building A Platform Or Marketplace?
For founders building the “next Uber Eats” in a niche, the future of the gig economy is full of opportunity - but getting the legal design right early will save you pain later.
Design for compliance, not just growth
- Terms that match reality: Draft Platform Terms and Conditions that reflect your operating model, dispute processes and risk allocation. Avoid vague or one-sided clauses that could be challenged as unfair.
- Transparent seller and worker onboarding: Clarify eligibility, documentation and verification steps (e.g. ABN, right to work, insurance, safety training). For contractors delivering services on your platform, set clear quality and conduct standards.
- Privacy and data handling: If you collect personal information from users, gig workers and merchants, you’ll need a compliant Privacy Policy and robust information security practices.
- Classification strategy: Map the relationship with your supply side (workers or merchants). If your model relies on contractors, pressure-test that approach through proper classification advice and operational controls that align with contractor status.
- Payments and taxes: Consider invoicing flows, GST treatment and whether your suppliers need guidance on registrations such as GST requirements for drivers and delivery partners.
As gig platforms mature, regulators increasingly expect fair, safe and transparent systems. Building those elements into your product and contracts from day one can be a competitive advantage.
What Should Gig Workers Do If Their Account Is Deactivated?
If your account is disabled by a platform, it can be stressful - especially if this is your primary source of income. While every case is different, a practical approach helps.
Steps to take
- Read the notification carefully: Understand the stated reason and whether the deactivation is temporary (e.g. pending documentation) or permanent.
- Review your agreement: Check the platform’s terms for the grounds of suspension and the appeals process, including any evidence you can provide.
- Gather evidence: Keep records of your trips, communications, delivery photos/screenshots and any safety incident details that support your position.
- Appeal within the platform: Use the app’s process to request a review, and stick to facts and documentation.
- Consider your legal options: Depending on your classification and the contract terms, different avenues may be available. Where classification is unclear, get quick legal advice before escalating.
On the compliance side, make sure your registrations are up to date. Most platforms require an ABN, and some gig workers will need to consider GST. If you’re unsure, start with the basics (for example, food delivery riders often ask about ABN obligations across platforms such as ABN requirements).
Compliance Checklist: Key Documents And Processes
Whether you’re a platform, a restaurant using delivery apps, or a courier running your own sole trader business, a few core documents and processes will make your life easier.
- Platform Terms and Conditions: For marketplaces, clear terms define the relationship with users and gig workers, set performance standards and outline issue resolution. Tailored Platform Terms and Conditions are essential.
- Privacy Policy: If you collect personal information (customers, riders, merchants), a compliant Privacy Policy explains what you collect and how you use it.
- Contractor Agreement: If you directly engage couriers, an appropriate Contractor Agreement sets scope, pay, equipment, safety standards and termination grounds.
- Classification Guidance: For platforms and merchants, specialist employee vs contractor advice helps align your contracts and operations with the law.
- Tax Settings: Understand GST, PAYG and invoicing flows. For drivers and riders, read up on GST requirements and keep clean records for BAS and income tax.
- Onboarding & Safety Policies: Clear onboarding checklists and safety procedures reduce risk and support fair decision-making when issues arise.
What’s Next For The Gig Economy In Australia?
Expect more clarity - and more responsibility. Regulators are signalling minimum standards for “employee-like” contractors in some sectors, better safety systems and clearer pathways to review platform decisions.
For businesses, the best strategy is to build compliance into your operating model. If you use contractors, ensure your daily practices reflect that choice. Keep your documents up to date. And treat disciplinary actions with the same care you would if unfair dismissal laws applied - because fairness and transparency are good for trust, retention and brand.
For workers, treat your gig work like a business. Keep your registrations and insurances current, track your income and expenses, and know the platform’s rules. If something goes wrong, act quickly, document everything and use the appeal channels available to you.
Key Takeaways
- Unfair dismissal laws usually protect employees, not contractors - so the classification of gig workers is the central issue.
- Delivery platforms typically engage couriers as contractors, but the legal outcome depends on how the relationship operates day to day.
- Clear contracts, transparent processes and safety-first policies reduce disputes for platforms, restaurants and riders alike.
- If you’re building a marketplace, invest early in tailored Platform Terms and Conditions and a compliant Privacy Policy.
- Restaurants using delivery apps should review agreements, align with the ACL and adopt practical pickup and data handling safeguards.
- Gig workers should maintain ABN and tax settings, understand platform rules and be ready to appeal decisions with evidence.
- The legal landscape is evolving - proactive compliance and sound advice are the best way to future-proof your model.
If you’d like a consultation about gig work classification, platform terms or your delivery business arrangements, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.







