Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- What Is an Illusory Promise?
- Why Do Illusory Promises Matter in Commercial Contracts?
- How Do Australian Courts Assess Illusory Promises?
Drafting Tips: How To Avoid Illusory Promises
- 1) Use Clear, Mandatory Language For Core Obligations
- 2) Add Objective Minimums, Standards or Timeframes
- 3) Constrain Discretions With Reasonableness, Notice and Purpose
- 4) Be Careful With Unilateral Variation Clauses
- 5) Avoid Purely Subjective Satisfaction Where Possible
- 6) Pair Termination Rights With Practical Protections
- 7) Keep Your Core Documents Tight
- Key Takeaways
When you’re running a business or negotiating a big deal, you rely on the promises written into your contracts. Those promises set the rules, share the risk and tell everyone what they must deliver.
But sometimes a promise looks like a commitment, yet doesn’t truly require the other party to do anything. That kind of “promise” can quietly undermine the bargain you thought you struck.
In Australian contract law, that’s called an illusory promise. In this guide, we’ll explain what illusory promises are, why they matter, how courts look at them, practical examples (and non-examples), and how to draft around the problem so your agreements remain enforceable and useful in real life.
By the end, you’ll know how to spot language that weakens your position, where the law draws the line, and simple ways to firm up your contracts without losing commercial flexibility.
What Is an Illusory Promise?
At a basic level, a promise is illusory when it looks like a commitment but doesn’t actually bind the person making it. If the promisor can choose whether to perform purely at their own whim-with no real obligation-then there’s no substance to that promise.
This matters because a binding contract generally needs consideration: each side gives or promises something of value. If one party’s “promise” lets them do nothing at all, the consideration can fail and parts of the agreement may not be enforceable.
Two simple indicators you’re dealing with an illusory promise are:
- The promisor has complete, unfettered discretion to perform (or not perform) without any real constraint.
- Performance depends entirely on the promisor’s subjective wish, not on an objective standard or a condition outside their control.
For example, “We may supply you from time to time if we feel like it” is not a commitment. In contrast, “We will supply a minimum of 1,000 units per month, and may supply additional units at our discretion” contains a core obligation plus optional flexibility-so it’s far less likely to be illusory.
To see how valid promises fit alongside other contract fundamentals like offer and acceptance, it helps to revisit the basics of offer and acceptance in Australian contract law.
Why Do Illusory Promises Matter in Commercial Contracts?
Illusory promises can weaken your legal position in critical ways. If a key obligation is illusory, you risk:
- Not being able to force performance of the deal when things go wrong.
- Struggling to claim damages because there’s no enforceable obligation to measure loss against.
- A court finding a clause void, or in rare cases undermining the broader bargain if consideration fails.
This doesn’t mean every broad discretion clause is dangerous. Commercial contracts often include flexibility: termination for convenience, step-in rights, unilateral variation mechanisms and performance discretion subject to agreed standards. Used well, these can be essential tools.
The key is that the core promises still need real substance. If a clause gives unlimited, consequence-free discretion over whether to perform at all, that’s when the “promise” can become illusory.
It’s also worth noting that Australian law may soften harsh drafting in some situations. Courts can imply duties (such as good faith or reasonableness) to prevent a party from exercising a discretion arbitrarily, and legislation like the unfair contract terms regime can rein in standard form terms used with small businesses. So, rather than assuming a court will never “fill in the blanks,” it’s better to assume your drafting will be interpreted in context-with implied limits if appropriate-but that clear, balanced drafting remains the safest route.
If you’re concerned a clause might be too vague or one-sided, a focused contract review can highlight the risk and propose practical alternatives.
How Do Australian Courts Assess Illusory Promises?
Courts look at the words used, the context of the contract and the parties’ commercial purpose. A few guiding ideas commonly appear in decisions:
- Is there a real commitment? If the promisor can simply choose to do nothing without consequence, the promise may be illusory.
- Is there mutual consideration? If overall consideration exists (for example, a minimum purchase obligation or an upfront payment), wider discretions elsewhere are less likely to cause issues.
- Can duties be implied? Courts may imply obligations of good faith or reasonableness, especially when a contractual discretion could otherwise be used capriciously or to defeat the bargain.
- Are there objective standards or constraints? References to “reasonable satisfaction,” “best endeavours,” minimums, service levels or notice periods help convert discretion into workable obligations.
Commonly misunderstood areas include:
- Termination for convenience: These clauses are not automatically illusory. If the contract otherwise has valid consideration and the right is exercised with required notice (and sometimes in good faith), the agreement can remain enforceable.
- Unilateral variation: The ability to change terms without agreement will be carefully scrutinised. In standard form contracts with consumers or small businesses, this may be void under the unfair contract terms regime. In negotiated B2B deals, reasonableness, advance notice and the nature of the change matter.
- Subjective conditions: A clause like “subject to our satisfaction” isn’t necessarily illusory if the law implies a duty to act honestly and reasonably in reaching that satisfaction.
If a clause is found to be illusory, a court may treat just that part as void. In some cases, if the illusory clause goes to the heart of the bargain, you may be dealing with unenforceable contracts issues more broadly.
Examples and Non-Examples You’ll See in Practice
Examples That Risk Being Illusory
- “We may order from you if we wish.” No obligation to order anything at all.
- “We will pay you such amount as we think fit.” Price left entirely to one party’s unfettered discretion.
- “We may provide services as we see fit.” No minimum scope, no service standards, and no objective constraints.
- “We can terminate at any time, without notice, and without consequence,” where the only promised benefit was continued performance. If one party can walk away immediately and owes nothing, the other side may be left with no real benefit of the bargain.
Non-Examples (Usually Not Illusory)
- Discretion with real constraints: “We will supply a minimum quantity each month and may supply more at our discretion.” The core obligation is clear, and extra volume is optional.
- Termination with notice: “Either party may terminate for convenience on 60 days’ notice.” There is still consideration in the ongoing performance and the benefit of the notice period.
- Reasonable satisfaction tests: “Completion is subject to the buyer being reasonably satisfied with due diligence.” An implied requirement of reasonableness helps prevent arbitrary refusal.
- Unilateral variation with guardrails: “We may vary service levels on 30 days’ notice, provided changes don’t reduce the core deliverables.” Notice and scope limits reduce risk.
In real deals, you’ll often see combinations-minimum commitments plus optional extras, termination rights plus notice, or satisfaction conditions linked to objective metrics. Those design choices usually keep a promise out of the “illusory” category and firmly in “workable and enforceable.”
If you’re assessing a draft and are unsure whether a promise has enough substance, getting a fast, practical contract review before you sign can save a lot of pain later.
Drafting Tips: How To Avoid Illusory Promises
You don’t have to give up commercial flexibility to avoid illusory promises. The trick is to anchor discretion to clear obligations and objective guardrails. Here are practical ways to do that.
1) Use Clear, Mandatory Language For Core Obligations
Where you expect performance, say “will,” “must,” or “agrees to.” Save “may” for genuinely optional extras.
Example: “Supplier will deliver 2,000 units per month. Supplier may offer additional promotional stock at its discretion.”
2) Add Objective Minimums, Standards or Timeframes
Specify minimum order quantities, service levels, milestones, delivery windows, or response times. If performance is variable, bake in a base level.
3) Constrain Discretions With Reasonableness, Notice and Purpose
Discretions are less risky when they’re tied to reasonableness, good faith, alignment with commercial purpose, and/or notice periods. Consider linking choices to objective factors (e.g. “market price indices,” “industry standards,” “mutually agreed KPIs”).
4) Be Careful With Unilateral Variation Clauses
In standard form contracts used with consumers or small businesses, some unilateral variation terms risk being void under the unfair contract terms regime. If you rely on these kinds of updates, build in notice, a right to exit if the change is materially detrimental, and be clear about what can and can’t change. If you’re unsure, get support via a UCT review and redraft.
When you genuinely need to tweak an agreement after signing, it’s safer to document the change properly. If you’re updating price, scope, or delivery terms, make sure you follow the amendment process in the contract and keep a clear paper trail. For larger changes, read up on making amendments to contracts and consider a short-form variation deed or amendment letter signed by both parties.
5) Avoid Purely Subjective Satisfaction Where Possible
Swap “in our absolute discretion” for “acting reasonably,” “based on objective criteria,” or “to the extent reasonably necessary.” If satisfaction is required, consider “reasonable satisfaction” and set out what will be considered (e.g. financial ratios, audit results, due diligence reports).
6) Pair Termination Rights With Practical Protections
For termination for convenience, add notice, accrual of sums due, payment for work-in-progress, and return or destruction of confidential information. This preserves consideration and fairness even if the relationship ends early.
7) Keep Your Core Documents Tight
Where possible, anchor your deals in robust, plain-English contracts tailored to your model, such as a well-scoped Goods and Services Agreement or clear Terms of Trade. If you’re building your templates or refreshing them, our team can help with contract drafting so your essential obligations are certain, and your flex points are properly bounded.
Finally, don’t forget the front-end mechanics. Even a perfectly drafted contract can fall over if execution is sloppy, so make sure the right people sign and that execution formalities are followed-especially for companies, where you’ll want to ensure the document is signed correctly and, where relevant, that signature pages line up with any requirements around execution and identity. If you need a refresher on formalities, it’s worth revisiting what makes a valid contract alongside offer and acceptance and, in practice, what counts as a valid signature in your process.
Key Takeaways
- An illusory promise looks like a commitment but gives the promisor unfettered discretion to do nothing, which can undermine consideration and enforceability.
- Not all broad clauses are illusory-courts consider context, may imply duties like reasonableness or good faith, and will uphold flexibility that sits alongside clear, substantive obligations.
- Common danger signs include “we may perform if we wish,” unfettered price discretion, and termination rights with no notice where there’s otherwise no meaningful benefit left for the other party.
- Draft around the risk by using mandatory language for core duties, adding minimums and service levels, constraining discretions with reasonableness and notice, and documenting variations properly.
- If you rely on standard form contracts, be mindful of the unfair contract terms regime-consider a targeted UCT review to stress-test unilateral variation and broad discretion clauses.
- When in doubt, get a quick contract review or refresh your templates with tailored contract drafting so your promises are clear, enforceable and aligned with how you actually trade.
If you’d like a consultation on reviewing or drafting your commercial contracts for your Australian business, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.








