Workplace Injuries and Commuting: Understanding Employer Liability

Contents

Commuting to and from work is something many employees take for granted, yet the legal implications when an injury occurs during this time can be complex. Under the general “going and coming” rule, injuries sustained while commuting are usually not considered workplace injuries. However, there are important exceptions that can make an employer liable. In this article, we’ll explore the legal landscape surrounding workplace injury during commuting, the exceptions to the rule, and what both employers and employees need to know to manage risk effectively.

Introduction

Workplace injury is a topic that affects both employees and small business owners alike. While most people understand that injuries sustained during the regular commute are not covered by workers’ compensation, the reality is more nuanced. The “going and coming” rule generally excludes injuries that occur while traveling between home and the workplace. However, certain circumstances can shift the balance, holding employers responsible for injuries that occur during travel if the trip is considered an integral part of the employee’s duties.

Understanding these nuances is crucial, especially if your business requires employees to use their own vehicles for work tasks or if you provide company vehicles. By clarifying employer liability, you can take the necessary steps to develop safer travel policies and manage your legal risks effectively.

The Legal Framework: The “Going and Coming” Rule

The “going and coming” rule is a well-established principle in Australian employment law. Essentially, it states that the time spent traveling to and from work is not considered part of normal employment duties. Because of this, injuries that occur during the regular commute are not typically eligible for workers’ compensation claims. This rule aims to narrow the scope of employer liability by distinguishing between work-related activities and personal travel.

That said, it is important to note that this rule is not absolute. Various exceptions exist, which make the determination of employer liability a question of context and specific circumstances. For instance, if an employer requires employees to use their personal vehicles for work-related tasks, or if an employee is on a special errand that benefits the employer, the injury might be considered within the scope of the job.

When Does the “Going and Coming” Rule Not Apply?

Several exceptions exist that can override the standard approach, including:

Required Use of Personal Vehicle: If your business mandates that employees use their own vehicles for work tasks, the commute may be deemed work-related. In these cases, injuries sustained during travel can fall under employer liability.
Special Errands or Business Trips: When employees are sent on a business-related errand or trip, especially if the employer pays expenses or expects the performance of certain duties, the injury risk may be covered under the “special errand doctrine.”
Company Vehicles: If an employee is using a company-provided vehicle for their journey, any injury sustained may be considered within the scope of employment.
Foreseeable Risks: Employers may be liable if they knowingly send an impaired employee home or fail to address known hazards, thereby creating a foreseeable risk of injury during the commute.
Workers’ Compensation Exceptions: Although workers’ compensation schemes generally exclude commuting injuries, exceptions exist where the commute confers a direct benefit to the employer or involves activity integral to the business.

Key Exceptions Where Employer Liability Can Arise

It is essential for both employers and employees to understand that even if the general rule excludes commuting injuries, certain scenarios warrant closer scrutiny. Let’s delve into these key exceptions in more detail.

1. Required Use of a Personal Vehicle for Work

Many small business owners require their employees to use their personal vehicles to carry out work tasks, such as visiting clients, collecting goods, or conducting business errands. In such instances, the time spent driving is often considered part of the workday. As a result, injuries that occur while driving for these purposes may be regarded as work-related. This exception is particularly relevant for businesses operating under structures such as sole trader arrangements where formal transport policies might not be well established.

2. Special Errands or Business Trips

If you send an employee on a special errand—where the primary purpose of the trip is to benefit the employer—then the injury sustained during that journey may lead to employer liability. For example, if your business requires employees to travel to a supplier’s location or attend a meeting at an off-site venue, these trips may not be considered ordinary commuting. Employers should document these trips clearly and outline their purpose within employment contracts or internal policies. This helps ensure clarity when determining liability should an injury occur.

3. Use of Company Vehicles

When a company issues a vehicle to an employee for both work-related travel and commuting, the line between personal and professional use becomes blurred. In such scenarios, the injury risk during the commute is more likely to be encompassed within the employer’s liabilities. Regular maintenance of company vehicles and proper driver training are essential steps to mitigate risk in these situations.

4. Foreseeable Risks and Negligence

An employer may also be held liable if they are aware—or should reasonably be aware—of conditions that could lead to an accident during commuting. For example, if an employee is visibly unfit to drive due to fatigue or the effects of a work-related incident, and the employer sends or allows them to drive regardless, liability could arise. In Australia, negligence in this context is taken very seriously, and employers are expected to implement strict policies to prevent such occurrences.

5. Workers’ Compensation Coverage Exceptions

Workers’ compensation schemes typically exclude regular commuting injuries. However, if the nature of the journey provides a direct benefit to the employer or if the commute is inextricably linked to a work-related activity, workers’ compensation may be applicable. These exceptions usually require a detailed analysis of the employee’s duties and the circumstances of the travel. It is important to note that in these cases, having legally binding contracts that clearly define work-related travel expectations and safety obligations becomes critical.

Implications for Employers and Employees

For employers, the potential liabilities arising from commuting-related injuries necessitate a proactive approach to risk management. Understanding the specific scenarios that may trigger liability can help you develop policies that mitigate these risks. This includes:

Implementing clear guidelines and training programs for employees who use personal or company vehicles.
Documenting any special errand or business trips that require employees to travel beyond the usual commute.
Regularly reviewing and updating company policies regarding travel, safe driving practices, and responding to impaired driving situations.
Ensuring that all employment contracts and internal policies are comprehensive. It’s worth considering how employment contracts address issues such as travel expectations and the potential for off-site work-related accidents.

For employees, knowing your rights is equally important. While the general rule excludes commuting injuries, the exceptional circumstances mentioned above could entitle you to compensation if an injury occurs during work-related travel. Being aware of the factors that might classify your commute as work-related can empower you to ask the right questions and seek clarification from your employer.

Prevention and Mitigation Strategies for Employers

Given the complexity of employer liability for workplace injuries during commuting, here are several strategies that employers can adopt to reduce risk:

Establish Clear Policies: Develop and enforce a robust travel policy that outlines when commuting is considered work-related. For instance, if employees are required to drive their own vehicles, ensure the policy specifies driving expectations and safety measures.
Provide Training: Regular safe driving training programs can help reduce accidents. Training sessions also serve to reinforce your company’s commitment to employee safety.
Review Employment Contracts: Ensure that your employment contracts and company policies clearly articulate the circumstances under which travel is deemed work-related. Consider consulting resources such as our guide on contractual obligations to ensure your documents are comprehensive.
Insurance Coverage: Review your workers’ compensation and public liability insurance policies to confirm that they adequately cover scenarios where an employee is injured during business-related travel. Sometimes additional coverage may be necessary to bridge gaps in standard policies.
Risk Assessment and Monitoring: Regularly conduct risk assessments related to employee travel. Monitor any incidents or near-misses and adjust policies as needed. Keeping an eye on regulatory requirements can also provide insights into evolving legal expectations.

Seeking Legal Advice and Further Resources

Because the landscape of workplace injury and employer liability is so complex, it is wise to seek expert guidance. Whether you’re an employer looking to refine your policies or an employee needing clarification on your rights, a qualified legal professional can provide the advice you need.

Government agencies such as Safe Work Australia and the Fair Work Ombudsman offer valuable guidance on workplace safety and employment rights. These resources can help you stay up-to-date with current standards and legal obligations.

For many small business owners, decisions about whether to structure the business as a company or remain a sole trader can have significant legal and financial implications. Understanding these differences is crucial, and our article on business structure matters can provide further insights.

Additionally, ensuring that your employment documents are tailored to your company’s operational realities can stave off unexpected liability issues. Detailed contracts that outline job responsibilities, travel obligations, and safety policies are indispensable tools in managing the risk of workplace injuries.

Conclusion

While the “going and coming” rule generally excludes commuting injuries from the realm of workplace injury claims, several important exceptions exist. Factors such as the required use of personal vehicles, special business trips, company vehicle use, foreseeable risks, and workers’ compensation exceptions can all lead to employer liability. Both employers and employees must understand these nuances to navigate the legal landscape confidently.

Employers should adopt proactive measures by drafting clear travel policies, providing adequate training, and ensuring that all contracts comprehensively address work-related travel issues. Employees, on the other hand, should remain informed about their rights and the specific circumstances under which a commuting injury might be compensable.

Ultimately, preventing and managing workplace injury during commuting is about balancing safety with clear legal and contractual frameworks. By recognising the exceptions to the “going and coming” rule and taking steps to mitigate risks, employers can reduce their exposure to liability while fostering a safer work environment for everyone.

Key Takeaways

The “going and coming” rule typically excludes commuting injuries from workplace injury claims.
Exceptions exist when the commute is considered work-related, such as when employees use personal vehicles for work, are sent on business trips, or use company vehicles.
Foreseeable risks and negligence on the part of the employer can also trigger liability.
Proper documentation, clear policies, and comprehensive employment contracts are essential to mitigate risk.
Employers should consult guidance from resources like Safe Work Australia and the Fair Work Ombudsman to ensure compliance.

If you would like a consultation on workplace injury, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.

Alex Solo

Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.

Do you need legal help?
Get in touch now!

We'll get back to you within 1 business day.