A major practical feature of the Act is the expansion of investigation powers. Section 335 was retitled to deal with the general power to require information and related material during investigations, and the Act also inserted section 335A, which creates an additional power to require information, documents or attendance from a further person where the statutory conditions are met.
Under section 335A, the General Manager may issue a written notice requiring the person to give information, produce or make available documents, or attend to answer questions and produce records and other documents relating to relevant matters. The period or time specified must be at least 14 days after the notice is given, and the time and place for production or attendance must be reasonable. A notice requiring attendance must also state that the person may be accompanied by another person, who may be, but does not have to be, a lawyer.
The Act also inserted section 335B, which requires the General Manager to complete an investigation as soon as practicable. It inserted section 335C, which permits disclosure of information acquired during an investigation where the General Manager reasonably believes disclosure is necessary or appropriate in performing functions or exercising powers, or is likely to assist administration or enforcement of a Commonwealth, State or Territory law.
After notifying a reporting unit of a contravention under section 336(1), the General Manager must also, within 12 months, make inquiries under section 330 as to whether the reporting unit is complying with the provision, guidelines or rule that was the subject of the notification.
The additional power in section 335A is backed by civil penalty provisions in section 337AA. A person must comply with a requirement made under subsection 335A(2). A person must also not give information or produce a document in purported compliance if they know, or are reckless as to whether, it is false or misleading. The same applies to statements made when attending in response to the requirement.
The Act preserves a reasonable excuse exception for failure to comply with subsection 337AA(1), but places an evidential burden on the defendant to show a reasonable excuse. The Act also deals with self-incrimination. A person is not excused from giving information, producing documents or answering questions under the relevant powers on the ground that it may tend to incriminate them or expose them to a penalty. However, for individuals, the Act provides use and derivative use protections in the proceedings specified by the legislation, subject to the stated exceptions for false or misleading information or statements.