Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
Exclusive dealing can be a smart commercial tactic when you’re investing in a channel, protecting your brand or rewarding loyal partners.
But in Australia, there are competition law rules you need to follow. If an exclusive arrangement goes too far and harms competition, it can breach the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA).
In this guide, we’ll break down what exclusive dealing is, when it’s likely to be a problem, common scenarios we see with growing businesses, and practical steps to manage your legal risk - all in plain English.
If you’re considering introducing exclusivity into your contracts, keep reading to understand the guardrails so you can do it the right way.
What Is Exclusive Dealing?
Exclusive dealing is when one business supplies goods or services on the condition that the other party restricts how or with whom they deal.
In practice, it often looks like:
- Agreeing to buy from only one supplier (single-brand supply)
- Agreeing not to sell or resupply in certain areas or to certain customers (territorial or customer restrictions)
- Bundling another product or service as a condition of supply (tying)
- Requiring a buyer to purchase from a specified third party as a condition of supply (often called “third line forcing”)
Australian law doesn’t ban exclusivity outright. The key question is whether the arrangement has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition (often called an “SLC test”).
Is Exclusive Dealing Illegal In Australia?
Not automatically. Many exclusive arrangements are lawful and common in competitive markets.
Under the CCA, exclusive dealing (including third line forcing) will be illegal if its purpose, effect or likely effect is to substantially lessen competition in a market. This is a practical, evidence-based test. Regulators and courts look at how the arrangement actually plays out in your market, including whether competitors and customers still have workable alternatives.
Key risk indicators include:
- High market power or significant market share for the business imposing exclusivity
- Long exclusivity periods that lock up important channels or inputs
- Wide territorial or customer restrictions that foreclose rivals
- “All or nothing” supply conditions that block access for competitors
- Tying or bundling that forces customers to take unwanted products/services
If an exclusive clause is time-limited, narrowly tailored and commercially justified (for example, to protect investment in training or promotion), the competition risk is usually lower.
If you’re unsure whether a planned arrangement crosses the line, it’s wise to get tailored competition law advice - the stakes can be high. Our team regularly helps businesses design lawful promotional and distribution strategies under the Australian Consumer Law and CCA.
Common Exclusive Dealing Scenarios (With Examples)
1) Distribution And Supply Agreements
Wholesale and channel strategies often use exclusivity to avoid channel conflict and to incentivise investment.
Typical clauses include exclusive territories, customer segment restrictions, or limits on competing brands. These can be legitimate if they’re proportionate and don’t shut rivals out of the market.
If you’re drafting or reviewing your channels, a clear, tailored Distribution Agreement or Supply Agreement can set the rules transparently and help you manage competition risk from the outset.
2) Franchising
Franchise systems commonly allocate exclusive territories and require franchisees to buy specified products and services to protect brand consistency.
These conditions need to comply with competition law and the Franchising Code. Careful structuring, robust commercial justifications and regular reviews are important as the network grows.
Whether you’re franchising your brand or joining a system, engaging a franchise lawyer early can help ensure the franchise, supply and territory clauses are set up lawfully and fairly.
3) Online Marketplace And Platform Rules
Digital platforms sometimes impose exclusivity (for example, preventing sellers from offering lower prices elsewhere) or bundle services. These provisions need to be proportionate to a legitimate platform objective and assessed against competition impacts.
If you operate a platform, regularly test whether your policies are necessary to protect users and quality, and whether less restrictive alternatives could achieve the same outcome.
4) Tying, Bundling And “Preferred Supplier” Programs
Requiring a customer to take Product A to get access to Product B (or to buy from a named third party) can raise issues, especially if Product B is essential or you have market power.
Preferred supplier programs are common, but they should allow a practical, good‑faith opt‑out where appropriate and be backed by legitimate quality or safety reasons.
5) Exclusivity During Collaborations
When you co-develop a product or run a joint marketing campaign, it’s normal to use limited exclusivity to protect what both sides put in. Keep it narrow in time and scope, and link it clearly to the collaboration’s objectives.
If the arrangement relies on sharing sensitive information or know‑how, put a Non-Disclosure Agreement in place alongside any exclusivity.
How To Assess And Manage Your Competition Law Risk
You don’t need to be a competition lawyer to spot red flags. Use this practical framework to sanity‑check your plan before you lock it into a contract.
Step 1: Define The Commercial Objective
Be clear on why you need exclusivity. Are you protecting a training investment? Preventing channel conflict? Ensuring quality standards? Write down the objective - it helps justify scope and duration.
Step 2: Map The Market And Alternatives
Ask: Who are the competitors? What alternative channels and suppliers exist? Could the clause foreclose a key route to market for rivals or lock customers into you without good reason?
The more alternatives available, the lower the competition risk generally is.
Step 3: Tailor The Scope (Keep It No Broader Than Necessary)
- Territory: Limit to where the partner will actually invest
- Customers: Define reasonable segments, not blanket prohibitions
- Products: Specify SKUs or product families; avoid catch‑alls
- Duration: Use short, reviewable terms with renewal options tied to performance
Step 4: Build In Safeguards
- Performance thresholds and “use‑it‑or‑lose‑it” clauses for territories
- Transparency on rebates/targets to avoid coercive pressure
- Good‑faith carve‑outs where required for safety or compliance
- Periodic review points to adjust or unwind exclusivity if market conditions change
Step 5: Choose The Right Contract Structure
Get the legal mechanics right so your deal is clear and defensible. Depending on your model, this may be a Terms of Trade, Distribution Agreement, Supply Agreement or, for systemised rollouts, a Franchise Agreement with a precise territory schedule.
For one‑off projects or pilots, a focused Exclusivity Agreement can be an efficient way to capture scope and duration without over‑engineering the arrangement.
Step 6: Sense‑Check Against The SLC Test
Finally, look at the arrangement from a market perspective. Would competition be significantly worse off because of your clause? If the answer might be yes, dial it back or consider alternatives (like non‑exclusive incentives, tiered discounts or quality accreditation programs).
What Should Your Contracts Say About Exclusivity?
If you decide to include exclusivity, the wording matters. Well‑drafted clauses can protect your commercial position while lowering competition risk.
Key Clauses To Consider
- Clear Scope: Define the products/services, territory, channels and customer segments covered by exclusivity.
- Duration And Renewal: Use short, fixed terms with renewal options tied to performance and compliance.
- Performance Requirements: Minimum purchase targets, promotional commitments and training obligations to justify exclusivity.
- Quality And Brand Standards: When exclusivity protects brand integrity, link it to objective standards and audits.
- Carve‑Outs: Allow reasonable exceptions (for example, legacy customers or safety‑critical supply).
- Compliance With Law: An express promise that both parties will comply with competition and consumer laws.
- Review And Variation: A mechanism to adjust or remove exclusivity if market conditions or laws change.
Which Documents Typically Include Exclusivity?
- Distribution Agreement: Channel allocation, territory rights, service levels and performance metrics.
- Supply Agreement: Preferred or exclusive supplier status for defined categories with volume commitments.
- Franchise Agreement: Territory exclusivity, approved products lists and system standards.
- Exclusivity Agreement (or Heads Of Agreement): Short‑form exclusivity during negotiations or pilots.
- Terms Of Trade (or Customer Contract): Limited channel or resale restrictions for specific offers.
Getting these documents tailored to your model helps avoid over‑broad restrictions and keeps you onside with competition law. If you’re building a new channel strategy, our team can prepare a pragmatic Distribution Agreement or Supply Agreement that fits your goals without unnecessary risk.
Consumer Law And Other Compliance Considerations
Exclusive dealing often sits alongside other compliance obligations. Make sure you’ve covered the basics so your strategy is robust end‑to‑end.
Australian Consumer Law (ACL)
Your advertising, pricing, and sales claims must be accurate and not misleading. This applies to both you and your channel partners. If you’re making claims about “exclusivity” or “only available here,” ensure they’re true and supported. For marketing teams, our quick guides to misleading or deceptive conduct and false or misleading representations are a helpful refresher.
Fair Contracting Practices
If you contract with small businesses or consumers, be mindful of unfair contract term rules and standard form agreements. Keep exclusivity clauses transparent, reasonable and linked to clear benefits and obligations.
Franchising Code Of Conduct
For franchise systems, territory allocations, approved suppliers and purchasing obligations must align with the Code. Transparent disclosure and proper documentation are key - working with a franchise lawyer can keep your system compliant as it scales.
Internal Governance
If you’re growing with co‑founders or investors, align your exclusivity strategy with your broader governance and growth plan (including your channel priorities and brand standards). Your operational contracts should work seamlessly with your commercial strategy rather than constrain it unintentionally.
Practical Tips To Keep Your Strategy Competitive And Compliant
- Prefer Narrow, Time‑Bound Exclusivity: Start small and expand based on performance.
- Use Alternatives Where Possible: Consider non‑exclusive incentives, rebates, co‑op marketing, or accreditation to drive partner commitment.
- Be Transparent: Explain to partners why exclusivity exists and how it benefits both sides.
- Measure And Review: Set KPIs and review points so you can adjust course without disputes.
- Document Cleanly: Put exclusivity into the right contract (not just emails) and align it with your Terms of Trade or channel agreements.
- Get Advice Early For Complex Markets: If you operate in a concentrated or highly regulated market, it’s worth a pre‑implementation legal check.
Key Takeaways
- Exclusive dealing is lawful in Australia unless it has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition.
- Risk increases with market power, long terms, broad territories, tying/bundling and “all or nothing” conditions that foreclose rivals.
- Keep exclusivity narrow, time‑bound and linked to clear commercial objectives, with safeguards and review points built in.
- Use the right contracts - such as a Distribution Agreement, Supply Agreement, Franchise Agreement or targeted Exclusivity Agreement - to set clear rules and reduce risk.
- Stay on top of related obligations under the ACL, franchising rules and fair contract term laws, and ensure your marketing remains accurate.
- For higher‑risk scenarios or concentrated markets, get competition law guidance before you launch the arrangement.
If you’d like a consultation on exclusive dealing, distribution or franchise strategies for your Australian business, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no‑obligations chat.








