Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
Building a brand takes time, money and care. When a competitor tries to ride on your reputation - using a name, logo, packaging or marketing that confuses customers into thinking they’re dealing with you - that’s where the tort of passing off comes in.
If you trade in Australia, understanding passing off (and how it works alongside the Australian Consumer Law and trade marks) can help you protect your hard‑won goodwill and respond quickly if someone crosses the line.
In this guide, we’ll break down what passing off is, how it’s proved, how it differs from trade mark infringement, practical steps to prevent problems, and what to do if you need to take action.
What Is The Tort Of Passing Off?
The tort of passing off is a judge‑made (common law) cause of action that stops one business from misrepresenting its goods or services as those of another. In plain English: it protects your reputation and stops competitors from trading off your brand’s goodwill.
To succeed, the claimant usually needs to prove three core elements:
- Reputation or goodwill: Your business has established a reputation in the relevant market - in your name, logo, get‑up (overall look and feel), product shape, slogans, or other distinguishing features.
- Misrepresentation: The other party made a representation that is likely to deceive or confuse the public into believing their goods or services are yours, or that there’s a commercial connection (like endorsement or affiliation) when there isn’t.
- Damage: You suffer or are likely to suffer damage - lost sales, dilution of brand, harm to reputation, or erosion of distinctiveness.
Passing off is flexible. It can apply to look‑alike packaging, a confusingly similar name, copycat websites, or misleading marketing suggesting a partnership with you. The key question is always whether customers are likely to be misled into believing there’s a connection to your business.
How Does Passing Off Differ From Trade Marks And The ACL?
In Australia, businesses often rely on three overlapping tools to protect their brand: passing off, trade mark law, and the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). They’re related but different, and you can sometimes use them together.
Passing Off vs Australian Consumer Law
The ACL prohibits conduct that is misleading or deceptive (section 18) and specific false representations (section 29). These statutory protections often sit alongside passing off in brand disputes.
Because ACL claims do not require proof of reputation in exactly the same way as passing off, many brand owners plead both causes of action. If your situation involves confusing marketing or look‑alike branding, it’s common to assess potential claims under Australian Consumer Law and, where relevant, section 29 false representations too.
Passing Off vs Registered Trade Marks
Passing off protects reputation you’ve built in the market, whether or not you’ve registered a trade mark. However, registering a trade mark gives you statutory rights that are often stronger and easier to enforce than passing off alone.
Key differences:
- Proof: Passing off requires you to show reputation, misrepresentation and damage. Trade mark infringement focuses on whether the alleged infringer used a sign that’s substantially identical or deceptively similar to your registered mark, in relation to similar goods or services.
- Scope: Passing off is broader in some ways (it can protect get‑up or product design that signals source), but a registered trade mark gives clear nationwide rights in your mark from the filing date.
- Evidence burden: Passing off often requires more evidence (sales figures, marketing spend, consumer recognition). A registered mark streamlines enforcement.
Practically, strong brand protection often uses all three: register the core brand elements as trade marks, maintain honest marketing to comply with the ACL, and rely on passing off when a competitor attempts to piggyback on your broader brand identity or get‑up.
What Does Passing Off Look Like In Practice?
The courts look at the overall impression on ordinary consumers. No single factor is determinative. Common scenarios include:
- Similar names in the same niche: A new entrant chooses a name that’s so close to yours that customers assume it’s your new product line or a related entity.
- Copycat packaging or “get‑up”: A rival mimics your colour palette, typography, bottle shape, and shelf layout so closely that shoppers grab theirs thinking it’s yours.
- Misleading endorsements: Advertising suggests your business endorses or is affiliated with theirs, without consent.
- Look‑alike websites or domains: A domain or website design is crafted to confuse users into believing it’s your authorised site or a partner.
Context matters. If your brand is distinctive, even small similarities can cause confusion. If your brand is descriptive or generic, you’ll generally need stronger evidence that consumers associate those features exclusively with you.
How Do You Prove Passing Off?
Evidence is crucial. If you’re considering action, start compiling documents that help demonstrate reputation, misrepresentation and damage.
Reputation And Goodwill
- Sales data and market share over time, showing presence in the relevant market.
- Marketing materials, ad spend, and media coverage that built recognition.
- Customer surveys or testimonials indicating that consumers associate the name, get‑up, or design with your business.
- Length and geographic spread of use - especially before the alleged infringer entered the market.
Misrepresentation
- Side‑by‑side comparisons of packaging, website design, store fit‑out, product shape, or advertising.
- Examples of confusion: customer emails, reviews, social messages, or misdirected orders.
- Evidence that the competing branding was intentionally designed to evoke your brand (if available).
Damage (Or Likely Damage)
- Declines in sales after the competitor’s launch, especially where you can correlate time periods.
- Evidence of brand dilution - for instance, confusion harming your premium positioning or reputation for quality.
- Lost opportunities, retailer complaints, or distribution issues caused by confusion.
Courts ask: would a significant number of ordinary consumers likely be misled? You don’t need to show every shopper is confused, but you do need to show more than a remote possibility.
Remedies: What Can You Get If You Succeed?
If you establish passing off, courts have discretion to award remedies, which can include:
- Injunctions: Orders stopping the infringing conduct (e.g. pulling products, changing branding, removing ads, or updating websites).
- Damages or account of profits: Compensation for your loss, or disgorgement of the profits they made from the misrepresentation (you usually choose one path).
- Corrective measures: Delivery up or destruction of infringing materials, packaging, or signage.
- Costs: A contribution towards your legal costs, depending on the outcome and the court’s view of the case.
In urgent cases, businesses often seek an interim injunction to stop ongoing harm quickly while the dispute is resolved.
Practical Steps To Prevent Passing Off Risks (And Strengthen Your Position)
Good brand hygiene reduces the chance of disputes and gives you stronger levers if something goes wrong.
1) Choose Distinctive Branding Early
Distinctive brand elements are easier to protect. Avoid generic or descriptive names that other traders legitimately need to use. Before you invest heavily, check for conflicting brands online, in trade mark databases, and on major marketplaces.
Make sure you understand the difference between a Business Name vs Company Name - registering a business name or company is not the same as obtaining exclusive rights to the brand. A registered trade mark is the better tool for that.
2) Register Your Core Trade Marks
Register key brand assets (name, logo, slogans) as a trade mark. This can deter look‑alikes, simplify enforcement, and complement passing off. Consider coverage for your main classes of goods or services and future expansion areas.
3) Lock Down Consistent Get‑Up
Document your brand guidelines - colours, fonts, packaging, and product shapes - and use them consistently. The more consumers associate that look with you, the stronger your goodwill case if a competitor mimics it.
4) Use Clear Website And Platform Terms
Where third parties interact with your brand online (affiliates, resellers, marketplace sellers), ensure your Website Terms and Conditions and any partner policies set boundaries on brand use, disclaim endorsements you don’t give, and prohibit misleading conduct.
5) License Your Brand Properly
If you allow others to use your brand, put formal guardrails in place. An IP Licence can control how the trade marks and get‑up are used, quality standards, and how the relationship is communicated to the public to avoid confusion.
6) Monitor And Act Promptly
Set up alerts for new domains, social handles, and marketplace listings similar to your brand. Keep an eye on retail shelves and online ads. Early action often resolves issues faster and cheaper than waiting until confusion spreads.
What To Do If Someone Is Trading Off Your Brand
When you spot potential passing off, move methodically. The right first step depends on the severity and the relationship with the other party.
1) Assess The Risk And Gather Evidence
Collect product samples, screenshots, timestamps, and examples of customer confusion. Compare side‑by‑side brand elements and note where and how consumers would encounter the look‑alike in the real world.
2) Consider Your Causes Of Action
Many matters can be framed as passing off and contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law, and sometimes trade mark infringement if you have registrations in place. A layered approach can increase pressure and improve prospects for a quick resolution.
3) Send A Tailored Cease And Desist Letter
A well‑crafted Cease and Desist Letter sets out your rights, the conduct you object to, and practical steps to resolve the dispute (e.g. rebrand timelines, stock run‑down, removing confusing ads). The tone should be firm, factual, and proportionate to the risk.
4) Negotiate Commercial Terms
In many cases, disputes resolve with agreed undertakings, rebrand schedules, or coexistence arrangements where confusion can be eliminated. If the other party wants to continue using a limited aspect of your branding, a structured IP Licence may be appropriate - but only if it genuinely removes confusion and protects your goodwill.
5) Seek Interim Relief If Needed
If the harm is serious or escalating (e.g. retailers stocking the wrong products, large campaigns underway), consider applying for an interim injunction to stop the conduct while the dispute is determined. This requires strong evidence and careful strategy.
Common Pitfalls (And How To Avoid Them)
Brand disputes can be nuanced. Here are frequent traps we see - and how small businesses can sidestep them.
- Assuming registration equals exclusivity: Registering a company or business name is an administrative step, not brand protection. Aim for trade mark registration early, especially before national rollouts.
- Underestimating get‑up: A competitor doesn’t need to copy your name to cause confusion. Consistent packaging, colour schemes and product shapes can function like indicators of source and become protectable over time.
- Delaying action: If you wait, confusion can snowball and rebrands become more expensive. Early, proportionate engagement is usually best.
- Overreaching claims: Not every similarity is unlawful. Be realistic about what consumers notice, and focus on the overall impression on an ordinary purchaser in your market.
- Ignoring internal alignment: If you endorse or partner with others, be crystal‑clear in public messaging to avoid accidental representations of affiliation that could backfire.
FAQs: Quick Answers To Common Questions
Do I need a registered trade mark to bring a passing off claim?
No - passing off protects unregistered reputation. That said, registering a trade mark gives you stronger statutory rights and can reduce the evidentiary burden compared with passing off alone.
Is passing off the same as misleading and deceptive conduct?
They overlap, but they’re different. Passing off is a common law tort focusing on protecting goodwill from misrepresentation. Misleading or deceptive conduct is a statutory prohibition in the ACL that addresses a broader range of conduct. Many disputes are pleaded under both, and sometimes under section 29 false representations too.
Can I use a descriptive name and still protect my brand?
It’s harder. Descriptive names are less distinctive and more difficult to protect under passing off or as trade marks. If you choose a descriptive term, consider investing in distinctive logos, stylisation and get‑up, and build strong market recognition over time.
What if I accidentally chose a name similar to an existing brand?
Act quickly. Assess the risk, consider a rebrand before confusion grows, and update internal and public materials systematically. If there’s a pathway to coexistence without confusion, document it properly (for example, by way of an IP Licence with clear boundaries).
Key Takeaways
- The tort of passing off protects your goodwill from competitors who mislead customers into thinking their products or services are yours.
- To prove passing off, you’ll need to show reputation, misrepresentation and damage - evidence and timing matter.
- Brand protection works best in layers: use passing off alongside the Australian Consumer Law and core trade mark registrations.
- Prevention helps: choose distinctive branding, keep consistent get‑up, set boundaries in your Website Terms and Conditions, and monitor for look‑alikes.
- If a dispute arises, move methodically: gather evidence, consider a Cease and Desist Letter, negotiate where suitable, and seek urgent relief if harm is escalating.
- Registering a business name or company is not the same as brand protection - understand Business Name vs Company Name and prioritise trade marks for exclusivity.
If you’d like a consultation about protecting your brand or responding to passing off in Australia, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no‑obligations chat.








