Business Law Library & Tracker

Selected Business Law Cases

Short explainers for court decisions that change how Australian businesses handle contracts, staff, customers, IP and company duties.

Sources last reviewed 8 June 2026

Main law guides

297

Acts, regulations and codes worth reading first

Topics

22

Plain-English clusters

Published case explainers

496

Selected cases with a business lesson

Tracked updates

110

New, amended & reviewed

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help
496 cases shown
High Court of Australia[2022] HCA 19 Feb 2022

Personnel Contracting

A contractor label will not save a labour-hire or contractor model where the legal rights and obligations point to employment. Businesses should draft for the real...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
High Court of Australia[2022] HCA 29 Feb 2022

ZG Operations v Jamsek

Long-running contractor relationships can still be genuine contractor arrangements where the contracts and business structure support independence, but businesses...

Read explainer
Employment & WorkplaceFinance, Payments & Security
Full Federal Court of Australia[2021] FCAFC 14213 Aug 2021

ACCC v Employsure

Read this case as a warning about the whole structure of a paid search campaign. The legal risk did not come only from one phrase in isolation. It came from the...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & TradingEmployment & Workplace
Federal Court of Australia[2021] FCA 36716 Apr 2021

ACCC v Google

Businesses collecting location or behavioural data should make privacy and consumer disclosures match the real product settings. Privacy wording can also be...

Read explainer
Privacy & DataConsumer Law & Trading
High Court of Australia[2021] HCA 234 Aug 2021

WorkPac v Rossato

Employers should use clear casual contracts, but should not treat WorkPac as the whole answer. Casual employment rules changed after the case, so documents,...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
Federal Court of Australia[2020] FCA 120320 Aug 2020

ACCC v HealthEngine

Data-sharing and review systems need to be designed honestly. A privacy disclosure problem can also become misleading conduct where users are not clearly told how...

Read explainer
Privacy & DataConsumer Law & Trading
Federal Court of Australia[2020] FCA 167220 Nov 2020

ACCC v Jayco

Warranty wording and customer service scripts must not understate consumer guarantee rights. Even where a business wins much of a case, one wrong statement about...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & TradingFood & Product Compliance
Federal Court of Australia[2020] FCA 100417 July 2020

ACCC v Kogan Australia

Sale pricing must be real. If a business raises prices before a promotion and then advertises a discount, the legal question is whether customers are actually...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & TradingDigital & Ecommerce
Federal Court of Australia[2020] FCA 1620 Jan 2020

ACCC v Trivago

Read this case as a decision about what an ordinary consumer would take from a digital comparison service. If your website or app highlights a result as top,...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & Trading
High Court of Australia[2020] HCA 4112 Nov 2020

Calidad v Seiko Epson

A patent owner may not control every downstream use after first sale. Businesses refurbishing, repairing, importing or reselling patented products need to...

Read explainer
IP & Brand ProtectionFood & Product Compliance
Full Federal Court of Australia[2020] FCAFC 6514 Apr 2020

Kraft v Bega

Treat get-up, packaging and product presentation as transaction assets. In this case, the Court's summary of the primary judgment was that the rights to the Peanut...

Read explainer
IP & Brand ProtectionBusiness Registration & Operations
High Court of Australia[2020] HCA 2913 Aug 2020

Mondelez v AMWU

Employers should calculate personal/carer's leave through ordinary hours and payroll rules, not informal notions of a calendar day. Shift patterns and enterprise...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
Federal Court of Australia[2019] FCA 728 Feb 2019

ACCC v Geowash

Franchise sales claims and upfront payments need hard controls. Money collected for site establishment, fit-out or setup should be used consistently with the...

Read explainer
Franchising & Regulated Industries
Federal Court of Australia[2019] FCA 1218 Jan 2019

ACCC v Ultra Tune Australia

Read this case as a first instance Federal Court warning on franchise basics. If you run a franchise network, treat disclosure updates, marketing fund reporting,...

Read explainer
Franchising & Regulated Industries
High Court of Australia[2019] HCA 1812 June 2019

ASIC v Kobelt

Kobelt is not permission to run informal credit loosely. Businesses dealing with vulnerable customers should treat credit, consent, account control and repayment...

Read explainer
Finance, Payments & SecurityConsumer Law & Trading
High Court of Australia[2019] HCA 329 Oct 2019

Mann v Paterson Constructions

Construction contracts should make pricing, stages and variations clear. If a contract is terminated after repudiation, the contract price can still shape or limit...

Read explainer
Construction & TradesContracts & Commercial
Federal Court of Australia[2018] FCA 104413 July 2018

ACCC v Servcorp

Small-business standard form contracts should not give the supplier one-sided control over renewal, price increases, termination, liability or security deposits....

Read explainer
Contracts & CommercialConsumer Law & Trading
High Court of Australia[2018] HCA 414 Feb 2018

Probuild v Shade Systems

Security of payment adjudications are designed to be fast and hard to unwind. Principals and contractors need to raise jurisdictional objections promptly and treat...

Read explainer
Construction & TradesContracts & Commercial
Full Federal Court of Australia[2018] FCAFC 13116 Aug 2018

WorkPac v Skene

Casual labels and casual loadings do not fix a relationship that is stable, predictable and treated like ongoing employment. Employers should use WorkPac v Skene as...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
Federal Court of Australia[2017] FCA 122413 Oct 2017

ACCC v JJ Richards

If your business uses standard form contracts with small business customers, ACCC v JJ Richards is a strong reminder to review the whole template, not just one...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & TradingBusiness Registration & Operations
Federal Court of Australia[2016] FCA 19624 Mar 2016

ACCC v Valve Corporation

Online businesses selling to Australian customers should assume the Australian Consumer Law applies, and refund or 'no returns' clauses cannot override consumer...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & Trading
High Court of Australia[2016] HCA 2827 July 2016

Paciocco v ANZ

Fees and liquidated damages should be tied to legitimate business interests, not just estimated loss. Penalty-clause analysis is broader than a simple damages...

Read explainer
Finance, Payments & SecurityContracts & Commercial
High Court of Australia[2016] HCA 5221 Dec 2016

Southern Han v Lewence

Security of payment claims depend on statutory timing. Contractors and principals should check whether a valid reference date or current statutory trigger exists...

Read explainer
Construction & TradesContracts & Commercial
High Court of Australia[2014] HCA 483 Dec 2014

Cantarella v Modena

Brand names do not have to be invented words to be registrable, but descriptive or foreign-language words need careful clearance. The question is how ordinary...

Read explainer
IP & Brand Protection
High Court of Australia[2014] HCA 3210 Sept 2014

Commonwealth Bank v Barker

Employment policies should be drafted and used carefully. Barker rejected a broad implied duty of mutual trust and confidence, but sloppy redeployment or redundancy...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
High Court of Australia[2013] HCA 5412 Dec 2013

ACCC v TPG Internet

Headline prices must show the real deal. If unavoidable charges are hidden, delayed or visually downplayed, a technically true price can still create a misleading...

Read explainer
Consumer Law & TradingDigital & Ecommerce
High Court of Australia[2013] HCA 16 Feb 2013

Google v ACCC

Advertisers are responsible for the claims in their search ads. Google won this case on platform responsibility, but a business that writes or approves misleading...

Read explainer
Digital & EcommerceConsumer Law & Trading
Federal Court of Australia[2011] FCA 71727 June 2011

ASIC v Healey

Directors need enough financial literacy and attention to company accounts to spot obvious problems. Signing reports or approvals without understanding them is not...

Read explainer
Companies & StartupsFinance, Payments & Security