EOFY Sale · Save up to $750 off your legals · Ends 30 June

Claim offer
Selected cases

Federal Court of Australia · [2026] FCA 510

Secretary v Key Promotional Products

A Federal Court regulator case about importing and supplying unregistered rapid antigen tests, false TGA approval claims and civil penalties.

Federal Court of Australia30 Apr 2026

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Check the linked official source before you rely on a specific section, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Businesses importing, supplying or advertising regulated health products must verify the exact ARTG status before sale.
  • A Federal Court regulator case about importing and supplying unregistered rapid antigen tests, false TGA approval claims and civil penalties.

Use this to check

  • ARTG status must match the exact product and legal supplier position.
  • Statements like TGA approved should be checked before every sales campaign.
  • Supplier emails and overseas records are not a substitute for Australian regulatory verification.

Decision snapshot

  1. 1

    What happened

    • Key Promotional Products Pty Ltd imported and supplied rapid antigen tests during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • The case proceeded on agreed facts.
    • Key Promotional admitted that between January and February 2022 it imported 255,000 RATs that were not included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods in relation to Key Promotional, and that it supplied at least 240,720 of them in Australia.
    • It also admitted making 2,303 false or misleading representations between December 2021 and March 2022 that the tests were of a kind included in the Register, including by saying they were TGA approved or attaching a record for a different medical device.
  2. 2

    What the court had to decide

    • The Federal Court had to decide whether to make declarations and civil penalty orders for contraventions of the Therapeutic Goods Act involving import, supply and false or misleading representations about medical devices, and whether leave should be granted to proceed against a company in liquidation under section 500(2) of the Corporations Act.
  3. 3

    What the court decided

    • The Court granted leave to proceed against Key Promotional despite its liquidation, made declarations of contravention, ordered Key Promotional to pay a $1.75 million penalty and ordered Mr Harding to pay a $250,000 penalty, with $70,000 suspended on conditions.
    • Costs orders of $60,000 against Key Promotional and $40,000 against Mr Harding were also made.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Businesses importing, supplying or advertising regulated health products must verify the exact ARTG status before sale.
  • Saying a product is TGA approved when it is not can trigger major penalties, even if the business later cooperates or enters liquidation.

Useful next steps

  • ARTG status must match the exact product and legal supplier position.
  • Statements like TGA approved should be checked before every sales campaign.
  • Supplier emails and overseas records are not a substitute for Australian regulatory verification.
  • Employees can be personally involved in company contraventions.
  • Liquidation does not remove the public-interest case for declarations and penalties.

Practical read

This case is a clean, practical warning for businesses that sell regulated products in a rush. The product was not an ordinary promotional item. A rapid antigen test is a medical device, and the Therapeutic Goods Act regime requires the right kind of inclusion in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods before import, supply and representations about approval.

The mistake was not just that the products were imported and sold. The representations also mattered. Emails said or conveyed that the tests were TGA approved or supported by an ARTG record, when the record did not cover Key Promotional's tests in the required way. The Court accepted that the conduct happened in a pandemic context, that there was no evidence of actual harm, and that the company made a loss. Even so, the risk to public health and the need for general deterrence were central.

For small businesses, the lesson is simple: do not rely on supplier assurances, similar product listings or another company's registration when selling regulated health, therapeutic, diagnostic, cosmetic-adjacent or safety products. Verify the exact legal basis for import, supply and advertising, and keep the verification record before taking orders.

Checks to run

Key points

  • Check the ARTG entry against the exact product, supplier and intended use.
  • Keep supplier certificates, regulator searches and approval checks together.
  • Review sales emails and product pages for TGA approved or similar claims.
  • Stop supply and refund where approval doubts arise before delivery.
  • Train sales staff not to copy regulatory claims from supplier materials without legal review.

Key takeaways

  • ARTG status must match the exact product and legal supplier position.
  • Statements like TGA approved should be checked before every sales campaign.
  • Supplier emails and overseas records are not a substitute for Australian regulatory verification.
  • Employees can be personally involved in company contraventions.
  • Liquidation does not remove the public-interest case for declarations and penalties.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help