Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- Overview
Common Mistakes With Pre Seed Fundraising
- Relying on a verbal deal or a vague email trail
- Using overseas templates without adapting them to Australia
- Giving away too much control too early
- Ignoring founder vesting and departure scenarios
- Leaving IP and contractor paperwork unfinished
- Missing the detail on dilution
- Failing to align the term sheet and long-form documents
- Forgetting the next round starts now
- Key Takeaways
Pre seed fundraising often happens fast, long before a startup feels legally tidy. Founders are usually focused on runway, product and investor interest, but the early legal mistakes tend to show up later, when a bigger round is on the table or a co-founder relationship starts to strain. Common problems include issuing shares on vague verbal terms, using an unsafe valuation shortcut, and signing investor documents without a proper contract review of how control, dilution and future fundraising rights actually work.
The good news is that most of these issues are avoidable if you sort them out before you sign. A sensible pre seed fundraising process is not about over-lawyering a young business. It is about making sure your cap table, founder arrangements and investment documents are clear enough to support growth. This guide explains what pre seed fundraising usually looks like in Australia, the legal points to review before taking money, and the mistakes that repeatedly cause trouble for startups at the earliest stage.
Overview
Pre seed fundraising is usually the first outside capital a startup receives, and the legal terms you accept at this point can affect ownership, control and later investment rounds for years. The main goal is to raise money cleanly, document it properly, and avoid terms that look harmless now but become expensive later.
- Confirm who owns the company, who holds shares, and whether founder equity has been documented correctly.
- Check whether the fundraising will be done through ordinary shares, preference shares, a SAFE-style instrument, or a convertible note, and understand the commercial effect of each.
- Review shareholder rights carefully, including voting, information rights, pro rata rights, board seats and consent rights.
- Make sure any term sheet, subscription agreement or shareholders agreement matches what was actually agreed.
- Check the company has authority to issue shares and has followed the Corporations Act requirements for the offer.
- Look at IP ownership, contractor assignments and employment arrangements before investors start due diligence.
- Keep clear records, board approvals and cap table updates so the round can be explained later.
What Pre Seed Fundraising Means For Australian Businesses
Pre seed fundraising usually means raising a relatively small amount of capital from angel investors, friends and family, early strategic backers, or an accelerator, before the business has much traction or revenue. In Australia, this stage often sits between founder self-funding and a formal seed round.
There is no single legal structure for a pre seed round. Some startups issue ordinary shares straight away. Others use convertible notes or SAFE-style instruments to delay valuation discussions until a later round. Each approach can work, but each carries different legal and practical consequences.
Why this stage matters more than founders expect
The main risk is not just getting the documents wrong. It is creating a messy foundation that later investors do not trust. When a future investor reviews the company, they will usually look at the cap table, constitutional documents, founder vesting, IP ownership and previous fundraising terms. If the early round was done informally, the business can lose time and leverage fixing old problems under pressure.
This is where founders often get caught. A simple promise to “sort the paperwork later” can turn into a dispute over valuation, discount mechanics, voting rights or whether someone was actually meant to receive equity at all.
Common structures used at pre seed stage
Founders in Australia often see three broad options.
- Ordinary share issue: investors receive shares now, usually at an agreed valuation. This can be straightforward, but it forces the company to settle price, ownership percentages and shareholder rights immediately.
- Convertible note: the investment is structured as debt that converts into shares later, usually when the next round happens. Terms often deal with conversion triggers, valuation caps, discounts, maturity dates and interest.
- SAFE-style instrument: the investor pays now for the right to receive shares later if certain events happen. These documents are often shorter than convertible notes, but they still need close review because their practical effect can vary a lot depending on drafting.
No structure is automatically the best option. The right one depends on the startup's stage, investor expectations, future fundraising plans and how much certainty the parties want now.
Australian legal context founders should keep in mind
In Australia, early stage fundraising still sits inside a legal framework, even when the round is informal. A company generally needs to consider the Corporations Act rules around issuing shares and offering securities. There may be disclosure exemptions available for certain investors or small-scale offers, but founders should not assume that every casual investment discussion is exempt.
The business structure also matters. Most external equity fundraising is done through a company, not a sole trader structure or standard partnership. If the startup has not set up the right company structure, or has mixed personal and business ownership of key assets, investors will usually ask for a clean-up before committing funds.
Pre seed fundraising can also expose issues outside the investment documents themselves. For example, if your core product was built by a contractor who never assigned IP to the company, or if a co-founder left without signing equity terms, that can become just as important as the fundraising paperwork.
Legal Issues To Check Before You Sign
Before you sign a pre seed fundraising document, you need to know exactly what investors are getting, what the company is promising, and what rights will continue into future rounds. The legal detail matters because small drafting choices can change control and economics in a big way.
1. Cap table accuracy and founder equity
Your cap table should be complete, current and internally consistent before any investor reviews it. If there is uncertainty about who owns what, the round starts from a weak position.
Check whether the company has:
- issued founder shares properly
- recorded share allotments and transfers correctly
- adopted a constitution that supports the proposed raise
- documented any vesting, reverse vesting or buy-back rights for founder equity
- kept ASIC and company register records up to date
A common founder mistake is treating an informal understanding as enough. If one co-founder says they have 30 per cent but the records do not support that, investors will want that fixed before they invest.
2. The exact fundraising instrument
You should never accept a standard form investment document without understanding how conversion, valuation and dilution will work in practice. The label on the document is not enough.
If you are looking at a convertible note or SAFE-style instrument, review points such as:
- what event triggers conversion
- whether there is a valuation cap
- whether there is a discount to the next round price
- whether there is a most-favoured-nation clause
- what happens if the company is sold before conversion
- whether the investor receives interest, repayment rights or both
- whether there is a maturity date and what happens when it arrives
These terms affect both founders and future investors. A cheap-looking short document can still produce heavy dilution if the mechanics are not clear.
3. Shareholder rights and control terms
Money is only part of the deal. The other part is control. Founders often focus on valuation and overlook the rights that sit alongside the investment.
Before you sign, check whether the investor is asking for:
- a board seat or board observer role
- veto or consent rights over key decisions
- information rights, including regular reporting obligations
- pro rata rights to invest in later rounds
- pre-emption rights on new share issues
- tag-along or drag-along rights
- special rights on an exit or winding up
Some of these rights are standard in the right context. The issue is whether they are proportionate at pre seed stage. A small investment should not automatically give an investor outsized control over hiring, budgets or future fundraising.
4. Warranties and founder promises
Investment documents often include warranties about the company. These are statements that the business is legally and commercially sound in certain respects. If they are inaccurate, there may be consequences.
Founders should pay close attention to warranties about:
- ownership of intellectual property
- employment and contractor arrangements
- disputes or claims
- financial records
- compliance with laws
- share capital and authority to issue securities
You should not give broad warranties casually, especially where the business is still early and some housekeeping is incomplete. Often the better approach is to identify issues and disclose them properly rather than hoping they stay unnoticed.
5. Intellectual property ownership
Investors back companies, not loose collections of assets and goodwill. If the company's IP is not clearly owned by the company, that can undermine the whole raise.
Before you sign, check whether:
- each founder has assigned relevant IP to the company
- developers, designers and consultants signed written IP assignment clauses
- open source software use has been reviewed where relevant
- the business name and brand are being used consistently by the right entity
- confidential information and invention obligations are covered in contracts, including confidentiality or non-disclosure terms
This point matters even if the startup is pre-revenue. For many early stage businesses, the IP is the main asset investors think they are funding.
6. Offer process and corporate approvals
The fundraising has to be implemented properly, not just negotiated properly. Even a friendly round needs the right approvals and records.
That usually includes:
- board resolutions approving the round
- shareholder approvals if required by the constitution or shareholders agreement
- signed subscription or investment documents
- updated registers and share certificates where applicable
- ASIC filings and company secretarial updates
If these steps are missed, the company may face a clean-up exercise later, often when there is less time and more pressure.
Common Mistakes With Pre Seed Fundraising
The most common pre seed fundraising mistakes come from speed, optimism and informal founder habits. Early-stage investors may be relaxed about process at first, but later rounds rarely are.
Relying on a verbal deal or a vague email trail
A founder may think the parties have agreed because everyone is “aligned in principle”. That is not enough when money has changed hands and the cap table is affected.
Problems often arise where the parties never pinned down:
- the amount invested
- the valuation or conversion formula
- whether the money is debt or equity
- what rights attach to the investment
- when the investor actually becomes entitled to shares
Before you rely on a verbal promise, get the legal structure and commercial terms into clear written terms.
Using overseas templates without adapting them to Australia
Founders frequently download US-style forms for SAFEs, notes and seed rounds. The issue is not that overseas documents are always unusable. The issue is that they are often built for a different corporate, legal and market context.
An overseas template may not sit neatly with Australian company law, your constitution, local market practice or the way future investors expect the round to be documented. It can also introduce language that sounds familiar but works differently than founders assume.
Giving away too much control too early
Pre seed investors sometimes ask for rights that make sense in a larger priced round, but are heavy for a small cheque. Founders can agree because they want certainty, or because they do not want to seem difficult.
This is where founders should pause before they sign. A right that gives investors approval over major decisions, future share issues, budgets or management changes can make the company harder to run and harder to finance later. Later investors may also resist a structure where early backers have special protections that no longer fit the company's size.
Ignoring founder vesting and departure scenarios
Investors often want confidence that founders will stay and build the business. If founder shares vest over time, or can be bought back when someone leaves early, that should be documented clearly.
Without a proper arrangement, a departed founder can end up holding a large percentage of the company while contributing little or nothing. That is one of the most common reasons a pre seed cap table becomes hard to explain in later rounds.
Leaving IP and contractor paperwork unfinished
Many startups build their first product through freelancers, development shops or part-time contributors. If their contracts do not clearly assign IP to the company, investors may worry that the company does not fully own its own product.
This also applies to co-founders who started building before the company existed. If the code, brand assets or product materials were created personally and never transferred properly, fix that before you sign investment documents that assume company ownership.
Missing the detail on dilution
Founders often focus on the headline percentage sold in the current round. The better question is what ownership will look like after conversion events, option pools and future raises.
For example, a valuation cap on a convertible instrument can produce more dilution than expected if the next round is priced strongly. Pro rata rights can also affect the room available for new investors later. The legal documents should be read alongside a cap table model, not in isolation.
Failing to align the term sheet and long-form documents
Some founders treat the term sheet as a summary and assume the full agreement will say roughly the same thing. That is risky. The long-form documents often contain extra detail on rights, transfer restrictions, warranties, dispute mechanics and default outcomes.
Before you accept the provider's standard terms, compare them line by line with the commercial deal you thought you had. If an investor discussed a light-touch role, but the draft includes broad consent rights and detailed reporting obligations, that should be resolved before signing.
Forgetting the next round starts now
Pre seed fundraising is not just about getting money into the bank. It also sets the story for the next raise. Later investors will ask how the current round was structured and whether any unusual rights or unresolved legal issues remain on foot.
Clean records, sensible rights and consistent documents make due diligence easier. Messy side letters, undocumented promises and inconsistent share terms usually do the opposite.
FAQs
Is a term sheet legally binding?
Usually only some parts are intended to be binding, such as confidentiality, exclusivity or costs, but this depends on the drafting. Founders should not assume a term sheet is non-binding just because it is called a term sheet.
Should a startup use shares or a convertible instrument for pre seed fundraising?
It depends on the stage of the company, investor expectations and whether the parties want to set valuation now. Shares can be simpler in some cases, while convertible instruments can defer pricing, but each needs careful drafting.
Do pre seed investors usually get board seats?
Not always. Some may ask for a board seat or observer right, but the appropriateness of that depends on the size of the investment and the startup's governance needs. Founders should look closely at whether the control rights are proportionate.
What if a founder or contractor never assigned IP to the company?
That should be fixed as soon as possible. Investors often expect the company to own the key IP outright, and gaps in ownership can delay or derail a raise.
Can founders raise money from friends and family informally?
Friends and family rounds still need proper legal documentation and corporate steps. Informal arrangements are one of the main causes of disputes and cap table problems later.
Key Takeaways
- Pre seed fundraising should be documented clearly from the start, even when the investors are supportive and the round feels informal.
- The legal structure matters, whether you are issuing shares, using a convertible note or signing a SAFE-style instrument.
- Founders should review control rights carefully, not just valuation, before signing any investment document.
- A clean cap table, clear founder equity terms and proper company approvals make later fundraising much easier.
- IP ownership, contractor paperwork and accurate warranties often become major diligence issues if they are left unfinished.
- Early legal shortcuts can create expensive problems in seed and Series A rounds, so it pays to sort them out before you sign.
If you want help with investment documents, shareholder rights, founder equity, IP assignments, you can reach us on 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.








