EOFY Sale · Save up to $750 off your legals · Ends 30 June

Claim offer
Selected cases

Federal Court of Australia · [2026] FCA 616

Australian Strategic Materials scheme

A Federal Court scheme case about Energy Fuels' proposed acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials through shareholder and optionholder...

Federal Court of Australia15 May 2026

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Check the linked official source before you rely on a specific section, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • A scheme of arrangement is a controlled court-supervised path for a major acquisition, not just a shareholder vote.
  • A Federal Court scheme case about Energy Fuels' proposed acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials through shareholder and optionholder schemes.

Use this to check

  • Schemes of arrangement usually involve two court hearings, not just a vote.
  • Scheme booklets need careful disclosure, verification and expert material.
  • Options, excluded shareholders and mixed cash/scrip consideration add transaction complexity.

Decision snapshot

  1. 1

    What happened

    • Energy Fuels Inc proposed to acquire Australian Strategic Materials Limited through concurrent schemes of arrangement.
    • ASM was an ASX-listed public company developing the Dubbo critical minerals project in New South Wales and operating a Korean metals plant.
    • The proposal involved a share scheme, under which Energy Fuels' subsidiary EFR Critical Materials would acquire ASM shares, and an option scheme, under which ASM options would be transferred for cash.
    • The scheme consideration for shares involved both scrip and cash.
  2. 2

    What the court had to decide

    • The Federal Court had to decide at the first court hearing whether to order meetings of ASM shareholders and optionholders under section 411 of the Corporations Act, approve the scheme booklet for distribution subject to updates, and set the matter up for a later approval hearing if the schemes were passed.
  3. 3

    What the court decided

    • The Court made orders convening the share scheme meeting and option scheme meeting, approved the scheme booklet for distribution subject to specified updates and annexures, granted EFR leave to be heard as an interested person, and adjourned the proceeding to a second court hearing for possible final approval.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • A scheme of arrangement is a controlled court-supervised path for a major acquisition, not just a shareholder vote.
  • Companies planning an exit need a clean scheme booklet, independent expert material, board-interest disclosure, ASIC engagement and a meeting timetable that can stand up in court.

Useful next steps

  • Schemes of arrangement usually involve two court hearings, not just a vote.
  • Scheme booklets need careful disclosure, verification and expert material.
  • Options, excluded shareholders and mixed cash/scrip consideration add transaction complexity.
  • Board and management interests should be disclosed clearly before meetings are convened.
  • Build the transaction timetable around both court hearings and member meetings.

Practical read

This is not an everyday small-business case, but it is useful for founders and boards thinking about exits. A scheme of arrangement is one way a company can be acquired with court supervision, member approval and a formal disclosure process. It is common in larger transactions, but the discipline behind it is relevant to any serious corporate sale.

The Court's role at this stage was not to give final approval to the acquisition. This was the first court hearing. The question was whether the shareholder and optionholder meetings should be convened and whether the scheme booklet could be sent out, subject to required updates and safeguards.

The business lesson is that exit planning is process-heavy for a reason. If a transaction depends on member approval, directors' interests, expert reports, foreign bidder securities, options, conditions precedent and ASIC review, the documents and timetable need to be court-ready before stakeholders are asked to vote.

Checks to run

Key points

  • Build the transaction timetable around both court hearings and member meetings.
  • Verify every material statement in the scheme booklet before it is sent.
  • Identify director, executive, shareholder and optionholder interests early.
  • Coordinate ASIC review, independent expert reports and accountant reports before meeting materials are finalised.
  • Keep conditions precedent and consideration mechanics simple enough for stakeholders to understand.

Key takeaways

  • Schemes of arrangement usually involve two court hearings, not just a vote.
  • Scheme booklets need careful disclosure, verification and expert material.
  • Options, excluded shareholders and mixed cash/scrip consideration add transaction complexity.
  • Board and management interests should be disclosed clearly before meetings are convened.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help