Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- Overview
Legal Issues To Check Before You Sign
- 1. Define the complaint process clearly
- 2. Separate acceptance, inspection and warranty periods
- 3. State the remedy hierarchy
- 4. Deal with freight, access and removal costs
- 5. Check any limits on liability
- 6. Match your warranty with your upstream supply chain
- 7. Watch pre-contract statements and specifications
- 8. Treat customer purchase orders carefully
- 9. Keep unfair contract terms risk in mind
Common Mistakes With Customer Complaint Refund Terms for Industrial Equipment Supplier
- Using “no refunds” wording as a shortcut
- Failing to distinguish custom orders from standard stock
- Leaving technical acceptance undefined
- Ignoring transit damage procedures
- Offering broad performance promises in sales material
- Setting complaint deadlines that are too aggressive
- Forgetting who bears downtime risk
- Not training the sales and service teams
FAQs
- Can an industrial equipment supplier say there are no refunds at all?
- Who usually pays return freight for faulty industrial equipment?
- Do complaint clauses matter if both businesses have dealt with each other for years?
- Should custom-built equipment have different refund rules?
- What is the main drafting issue before accepting a customer's purchase order?
- Key Takeaways
If you supply industrial equipment, customer complaints can get expensive fast. A delayed replacement part, a machine that does not perform to spec, or damage discovered after delivery can turn into a dispute about refunds, repairs, downtime, freight costs and liability. The problem is that many suppliers rely on short quotes, old purchase order terms, or verbal promises from the sales team. That is where businesses often get caught.
Common mistakes include using “no refunds” wording that does not match Australian Consumer Law, failing to define a complaint process and timeframe, and promising performance outcomes that your written terms do not support. Another regular issue is leaving return freight, inspection rights and re-stocking rules vague, especially where equipment is custom-built or imported.
This guide explains how customer complaint and refund terms usually work for industrial equipment suppliers in Australia, what clauses matter before you sign, and where suppliers most often create legal and commercial risk for themselves.
Overview
For Australian industrial equipment suppliers, refund and complaint clauses need to do two jobs at once. They should give your team a practical process for handling product issues, while also staying consistent with the non-excludable rights that can apply under Australian law.
Well-drafted supply terms usually reduce arguments about what happens when equipment is defective, delayed, damaged, incorrectly specified or rejected after delivery.
- how your contract defines defects, faults, damage and non-conformity
- when a customer must inspect and notify you about a complaint
- whether your remedy is repair, replacement, re-supply, refund or a combination
- how Australian Consumer Law guarantees may affect your terms
- who pays freight, removal, reinstallation and testing costs
- whether custom-made, special order or imported equipment is treated differently
- what evidence the customer must provide, such as photos, serial numbers or testing reports
- how you deal with downtime, loss of profit and other indirect loss claims
- whether your supplier or manufacturer warranties line up with the promises you give customers
- how your quote, purchase order, terms and warranty documents work together
What Customer Complaint Refund Terms for Industrial Equipment Supplier Means For Australian Businesses
These clauses set the rules for what happens when a customer says the equipment is faulty, damaged, delayed or not what they ordered. For an Australian supplier, the real task is balancing a fair process with clear limits, without trying to contract out of rights that cannot legally be excluded.
Why these terms matter in industrial supply contracts
Industrial equipment disputes are rarely just about the price of the goods. They often involve installation delays, lost production time, site access issues, compatibility with existing systems, and arguments over who caused the problem.
That is why a simple “returns accepted within 7 days” clause usually is not enough. Industrial supply agreements need to deal with technical acceptance, inspection, commissioning and fault reporting in a much more detailed way.
What counts as a customer complaint
Your contract should say what kinds of complaints are covered. If the document is silent, parties often argue later about whether the issue was a defect, a change request, misuse, wear and tear, or a problem with installation carried out by someone else.
Common complaint categories include:
- equipment damaged in transit
- goods supplied that do not match the quote, specification or purchase order
- manufacturing defects
- short supply or missing components
- failure to meet an agreed performance standard
- installation or commissioning issues, where installation is part of the deal
- warranty claims arising during the warranty period
Refund terms are only one part of the remedy framework
A refund is not always the first or only remedy. In many B2B equipment deals, the supplier wants the first right to inspect the goods and decide whether to repair, replace or refund, subject to any legal limits that apply.
Your terms should make that hierarchy clear. If you do not, a customer may assume they can reject the goods immediately and demand all their money back, even where the issue is minor and fixable.
Australian Consumer Law still matters in some business sales
Many suppliers assume consumer law is irrelevant because they sell to businesses. That is not always right. The Australian Consumer Law can still apply to business-to-business supply arrangements, depending on the circumstances and the nature and value of the goods or services.
The key point is simple: you should not use blanket statements like “no refunds under any circumstances” or “all warranties excluded”. Some statutory guarantees and remedies may still apply, and contract terms should be drafted to work alongside them, not pretend they do not exist.
This matters even more where your sales team uses brochures, proposals or emails that describe the equipment’s capability. Those statements can influence whether goods match description, are fit for a disclosed purpose, or meet the standard the customer reasonably expected.
Custom equipment needs special treatment
Custom-built or made-to-order equipment often cannot be resold easily. Suppliers usually want tighter refund rights for these orders, but the drafting needs to be careful.
You can usually set clear rules around design sign-off, deposit treatment, change requests, manufacturing milestones and cancellation fees. What you cannot safely do is assume that “custom order” wording lets you ignore defects, major failures or misleading pre-contract promises.
Documents should say the same thing
Founders often focus on the main terms and conditions, but the dispute actually starts in the quote, the scope of works or the warranty booklet. If one document promises “full refund if not satisfied” and another says “repair only”, your business has created the argument before the goods even leave the warehouse.
Before you sign a contract or accept the customer’s purchase order, make sure the following documents align:
- quotation or proposal
- technical specification
- purchase order
- supply terms and conditions
- warranty terms
- installation or commissioning scope
- manufacturer warranty documents
- emails from sales staff about performance or lead times
Legal Issues To Check Before You Sign
The safest time to fix refund and complaint terms is before you accept the provider's standard terms, before you issue your own quote, and before you rely on a verbal promise made during sales discussions. Once equipment is delivered or manufactured, your practical leverage often drops.
1. Define the complaint process clearly
Your agreement should set out exactly how a customer raises a complaint. If the process is vague, the parties can spend weeks arguing about whether notice was valid instead of dealing with the equipment issue.
A clear process usually covers:
- who the customer must notify
- the required form of notice, such as email with order and serial details
- the time limit for reporting transit damage, shortages and visible defects
- the time limit for hidden defects discovered later
- what supporting evidence must be provided
- whether the customer must stop using the equipment once a serious defect is identified
- whether you have a right to inspect before goods are returned or altered
2. Separate acceptance, inspection and warranty periods
These are different concepts and should not be mashed together. An inspection period deals with what the customer should check on or soon after delivery. A warranty period deals with covered faults over time. Acceptance may happen on delivery, after installation, or after commissioning tests.
If you do not separate them, customers may argue that they can reject goods months later as if the order was never accepted. Suppliers may also accidentally shorten warranty rights by relying on a brief delivery inspection clause that was not drafted for long-term faults.
3. State the remedy hierarchy
Your contract should say what remedy is available first, and in what order. That gives both sides a framework when something goes wrong.
Depending on the deal, the agreement might provide that you may:
- inspect the goods first
- repair the defect within a stated period
- replace the goods or affected component
- re-supply services, such as installation or calibration
- refund the price for the affected goods if repair or replacement is not suitable
- credit the customer for future purchases, if both sides agree
The wording should also cover whether the remedy applies to the whole order or only the affected part.
4. Deal with freight, access and removal costs
This is where real money disappears. A dispute about a faulty motor or control panel often turns into a larger argument about who pays for site attendance, lifting equipment, deinstallation, reinstallation, return freight and testing.
Your terms should spell out responsibility for:
- delivery and return freight
- packaging for return transport
- site access and safe work conditions
- disconnecting and reconnecting equipment
- travel and accommodation for technicians
- testing and recommissioning after repair
- costs caused by customer misuse or unauthorised modifications
5. Check any limits on liability
Industrial equipment buyers often ask for broad compensation if a machine fails, including lost production, labour costs, project delay losses and third-party claims. Suppliers usually want to exclude indirect and consequential loss and cap liability to a fixed amount.
These clauses need careful drafting. A liability cap that conflicts with other promises in the contract, or tries to exclude non-excludable rights, can create more uncertainty instead of less. The cap should also match the commercial reality of the job, your insurance obligations and position, and any upstream manufacturer support.
6. Match your warranty with your upstream supply chain
Do not promise a customer a remedy that your own manufacturer or wholesaler will not support. This is a common issue with imported equipment, white-labelled products and specialist components.
Before you sign, compare:
- the warranty period you give your customer
- the warranty period your supplier gives you
- what defects are excluded upstream
- lead times for replacement parts
- whether labour and freight are covered
- whether software or consumables are excluded
If those positions do not line up, your business may end up absorbing the gap.
7. Watch pre-contract statements and specifications
Sales conversations matter. If your team promises that equipment will achieve a certain throughput, integrate with existing systems, or work in a harsh site environment, those statements can shape the customer’s expectations and your legal exposure.
Before you sign, make sure the final contract records key assumptions, customer responsibilities and performance conditions. This is particularly important where output depends on factors outside your control, such as power supply, operator skill, maintenance, or site conditions.
8. Treat customer purchase orders carefully
Many disputes are really “battle of the forms” disputes. You send a quote with your terms, the customer sends a purchase order with different terms, and both parties proceed without resolving the inconsistency.
Your contract should say which document prevails if terms conflict. Without a precedence clause, you may end up litigating whose terms governed the refund and complaint process in the first place.
9. Keep unfair contract terms risk in mind
Standard form B2B contracts can face scrutiny under Australia’s unfair contract terms regime. This is particularly relevant if your business uses non-negotiable standard terms with smaller customers.
That does not mean you cannot protect your position. It means clauses about unilateral discretion, very short complaint windows, broad indemnities or one-sided liability settings should be checked carefully before you roll them out.
Common Mistakes With Customer Complaint Refund Terms for Industrial Equipment Supplier
The biggest mistakes usually happen in ordinary sales processes, not in dramatic disputes. A rushed quote, an unchecked warranty PDF or a loose promise from a salesperson can undermine the position you thought your contract covered.
Using “no refunds” wording as a shortcut
A blanket no-refunds statement is often more dangerous than helpful. It can be misleading, it may not reflect rights that still apply under law, and it tends to inflame the customer relationship before anyone has assessed the problem properly.
A better approach is to set out a lawful, practical remedy process.
Failing to distinguish custom orders from standard stock
Standard products and bespoke equipment do not present the same risk. If your terms treat them identically, you may either give away too much on custom orders or create unnecessary friction on ordinary stock items.
Custom projects often need extra clauses about design approval, variation requests, cancellation after manufacture starts, and customer-supplied specifications.
Leaving technical acceptance undefined
For many equipment deals, delivery alone does not prove the goods are fit for purpose. The customer may expect testing, commissioning or performance validation.
If the agreement does not say how acceptance works, arguments can arise about whether the machine has been accepted, whether the customer can keep using it while rejecting it, and whether the complaint relates to the goods or to the site setup.
Ignoring transit damage procedures
Damage in transit is common and time-sensitive. If your terms do not require prompt inspection and notice, your insurer or carrier may deny recovery, leaving the supplier and customer fighting over who should wear the loss.
Short, clear notice periods for visible transit damage are usually worth including.
Offering broad performance promises in sales material
The main risk is not always in the contract itself. It can sit in a proposal, capability statement or email that says the equipment “will handle any site conditions” or “guarantees production increases”.
If those statements are not qualified, they may be relied on later as part of the bargain. This is where founders often get caught, especially when technical staff and sales staff use different language.
Setting complaint deadlines that are too aggressive
Suppliers often want short reporting windows, but a clause can backfire if it is unrealistic for the type of defect involved. Hidden faults in industrial equipment may not appear on day one.
The better approach is to use different timeframes for:
- visible delivery damage
- short supply and obvious errors
- installation and commissioning issues
- latent defects discovered during normal use
- warranty claims during the warranty period
Forgetting who bears downtime risk
If equipment fails, the customer may try to recover losses far beyond the purchase price. If your contract does not address downtime, delay losses and consequential loss clearly, the parties can have very different expectations about what is recoverable.
This is especially relevant in manufacturing, logistics, construction and food production environments where one failed component can stop an entire line.
Not training the sales and service teams
A carefully drafted contract does not help much if your team gives side promises that cut across it. Complaint handling staff should know what they can offer, when a contract review or legal review is needed, and when an admission could create a bigger issue.
Simple internal scripts and escalation rules can prevent inconsistent messages.
FAQs
Can an industrial equipment supplier say there are no refunds at all?
Not safely as a blanket rule. Your contract can set a process and preferred remedies, but it should not pretend that all statutory rights and remedies can be excluded in every case.
Who usually pays return freight for faulty industrial equipment?
That depends on the contract and the cause of the issue. Good supply terms deal expressly with return freight, inspection, removal and reinstallation costs so the parties are not left arguing after the fault appears.
Do complaint clauses matter if both businesses have dealt with each other for years?
Yes. Long trading relationships often rely on informal understandings, which can become a problem when there is staff turnover, a large order, or a serious equipment failure. Clear written terms reduce reliance on memory and verbal assurances.
Should custom-built equipment have different refund rules?
Usually, yes. Custom equipment often needs separate clauses on design approval, cancellation, variations, acceptance testing and what happens if the goods cannot be resold. Those clauses still need to work alongside any legal rights that cannot be excluded.
What is the main drafting issue before accepting a customer's purchase order?
You need to know which terms actually apply. If your quote says one thing and the customer purchase order says another, a precedence clause and a clear acceptance process are essential.
Key Takeaways
- Customer complaint and refund terms for industrial equipment suppliers should cover far more than whether a refund is available.
- Your agreement should define defects, set notice and inspection rules, and explain the remedy process for repair, replacement, re-supply or refund.
- Australian Consumer Law may still affect B2B supply arrangements, so blanket no-refunds or all-warranties-excluded wording can create risk.
- Custom-built equipment usually needs separate clauses for design sign-off, cancellation, acceptance testing and allocation of manufacturing risk.
- Freight, removal, reinstallation, site access and downtime costs are common dispute areas and should be addressed expressly.
- Your quote, technical specification, warranty and sales communications should all align so you are not making inconsistent promises.
- Before you sign, check liability caps, unfair contract terms risk, and whether your upstream manufacturer warranty actually supports what you promise customers.
If you want help with supply terms, warranty clauses, liability caps, and purchase order conflicts, you can reach us on 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.







