EOFY Sale · Save up to $750 off your legals · Ends 30 June

Claim offer
Selected cases

Federal Court of Australia · [2026] FCA 192

Kirk v Commissioner of State Revenue

A Federal Court unfair preference case requiring the Queensland revenue authority to repay payroll tax payments received from insolvent...

Federal Court of Australia4 Mar 2026

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Check the linked official source before you rely on a specific section, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Payroll tax, payment plans and insolvency do not sit in separate boxes.
  • A Federal Court unfair preference case requiring the Queensland revenue authority to repay payroll tax payments received from insolvent labour hire companies.

Use this to check

  • Payments of old debts shortly before liquidation can be unfair preferences.
  • Revenue authorities and other creditors may still face voidable transaction recovery claims.
  • A good-faith defence can fail if the creditor cannot prove the relevant state of knowledge.

Decision snapshot

  1. 1

    What happened

    • ARG Workforce and ARG Payroll operated a labour hire services business within the wider ARG group.
    • Darryl Kirk was appointed liquidator of both companies on 2 February 2022.
    • The companies had made payments to the Queensland Revenue Office during the six months ending on the relation-back day: $2,474,375.01 from Workforce and $345,791.57 from Payroll.
    • It was common ground that those payments were voidable transactions unless the Commissioner of State Revenue could rely on the good-faith defence in s 588FG(2) of the Corporations Act.
  2. 2

    What the court had to decide

    • The Court had to decide whether the Commissioner of State Revenue could resist the liquidator's unfair preference claims by relying on s 588FG(2) of the Corporations Act.
    • Because the payments were accepted to be voidable transactions, the central issues were whether the QRO received them in good faith, whether it had no reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency, and whether a reasonable person in its circumstances would have had no such grounds.
  3. 3

    What the court decided

    • The Federal Court declared the relevant Workforce and Payroll payments to be unfair preferences, insolvent transactions and voidable transactions.
    • It ordered the Commissioner to pay $2,474,375.01 to ARG Workforce and $345,791.57 to ARG Payroll, plus interest, and ordered the Commissioner to pay the plaintiffs' costs.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Payroll tax, payment plans and insolvency do not sit in separate boxes.
  • If a company pays old tax debts shortly before liquidation, those payments can be attacked as unfair preferences.
  • Creditors, including revenue authorities, may need strong records showing why they received payments in good faith and without reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency.

Useful next steps

  • Payments of old debts shortly before liquidation can be unfair preferences.
  • Revenue authorities and other creditors may still face voidable transaction recovery claims.
  • A good-faith defence can fail if the creditor cannot prove the relevant state of knowledge.
  • Payment plans should record financial hardship, solvency checks and escalation decisions clearly.
  • Payroll tax grouping, labour hire structures and phoenixing concerns can create long-running risk.

Practical read

This case is about more than tax. It shows how payroll-heavy businesses, labour hire groups and creditors can end up in insolvency litigation years after payments were made. ARG Workforce and ARG Payroll were labour hire companies. They owed payroll tax, entered payment arrangements, made substantial payments to the Queensland Revenue Office, and later went into liquidation.

The legal fight was not whether the payments were made. They were. It was also common ground that the payments were voidable unless the Commissioner could establish the statutory good-faith defence. That defence required the Commissioner to prove, among other things, that the QRO became a party to the transactions in good faith and had no reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency.

The problem for the Commissioner was proof. The QRO had years of file material: a Phoenix Taskforce referral from Victoria, references to group companies in liquidation, registration and grouping issues, default assessments, overdue debts, payment plans, bank notices and recovery communications. Some witnesses could prove documents but did not remember the key events. Another relevant officer did not give evidence. The Court accepted the witnesses' honesty, but that did not fill the evidentiary gap.

The Commissioner bore the onus and did not discharge it.

For businesses, the operating point is simple. Payroll tax and employment-linked liabilities are not just back-office admin. If a company is trading under pressure, payments to one creditor can later be reviewed against what other creditors missed out on. For creditors and finance teams, the case is a reminder that old file notes, payment-plan forms, internal escalations and insolvency-risk checks may become decisive evidence years later.

Checks to run

Key points

  • Keep payroll tax registrations, grouping analysis and state-revenue correspondence current.
  • When asking for a payment plan, make sure hardship and solvency statements are accurate.
  • If the business is under pressure, review whether paying one old creditor creates preference risk.
  • Preserve file notes of what creditors knew, requested and were told about the company's finances.
  • For labour hire groups, document which entity employs staff, invoices clients and pays tax.
  • If liquidation is possible, get advice before making large arrears payments outside ordinary trading terms.

Key takeaways

  • Payments of old debts shortly before liquidation can be unfair preferences.
  • Revenue authorities and other creditors may still face voidable transaction recovery claims.
  • A good-faith defence can fail if the creditor cannot prove the relevant state of knowledge.
  • Payment plans should record financial hardship, solvency checks and escalation decisions clearly.
  • Payroll tax grouping, labour hire structures and phoenixing concerns can create long-running risk.
  • Businesses should treat tax payment arrangements as insolvency-sensitive documents.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help