Business Law Library & Tracker

Selected Business Law Cases

Short explainers for court decisions that change how Australian businesses handle contracts, staff, customers, IP and company duties.

Sources last reviewed 7 Sept 2026

Main law guides

297

Acts, regulations and codes worth reading first

Topics

22

Plain-English clusters

Published case explainers

511

Selected cases with a business lesson

Tracked updates

125

New, amended & reviewed

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help
511 cases shown
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1004

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd (No 2)

If your business is dealing with the ACCC or another regulator, do not treat privilege review as a box-ticking exercise. This case shows that courts may protect...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1043

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd (No 3)

If your business is in a dispute, do not treat privilege as something that is protected automatically once lawyers are involved. This case shows that the real risk...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1084

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.) (No 4)

The practical takeaway is to read this as a pleading decision, not a liability ruling. The Court was deciding whether the ACCC had pleaded an arguable case, not...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1177

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Optus Mobile Pty Limited

If your business sells to consumers, this case is a practical warning to review the whole sales pathway, not just scripts and disclosures. You need to know whether...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 371

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qteq Pty Ltd

Business owners should read this case as a warning about competitor contact. The legal risk point is not limited to a completed cartel agreement. If your team...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1220

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Limited (No 2)

If your business changes what customers receive, whether by moving them to a different tier, altering features, changing service levels or reframing the value of a...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 867

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Webjet Marketing Pty Ltd

Business owners should treat this case as a systems and messaging case, not just an advertising case. The Court accepted that the relevant question was the...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1154

Australian Property Scout Holdings Pty Ltd v Titus (No 2)

For business owners, the case is a reminder that urgent injunctions are won on precision, evidence and drafting. If you want immediate protection, it helps to...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1563

Australian Retirement Trust Pty Ltd ATF Australian Retirement Trust v Buckland

Read this case as a contract administration warning. Start with the exact words that fix the trigger. Here, the decisive wording referred to the date on which a...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1593

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Retail Cases Omnibus)

The commercial lesson from this case is that customer promises, compliance obligations and operational controls have to line up. ANZ’s admitted conduct was spread...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1592

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Treasury Bonds Case)

Business owners should read this as a case about conduct matching representations. ANZ had represented that it would be transparent with the AOFM, yet the court...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia - Full Court[2025] FCAFC 74

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v BPS Financial Pty Ltd

If your business is launching a payment or wallet product under someone else's AFSL, do not assume the structure works just because there is an authorised...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 938

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Darranda Pty Ltd (Penalty)

The main lesson is to test the legal substance of your customer arrangement, not just its label. If a customer gets goods now and pays over time, your document may...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1571

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Green County Pty Ltd (Penalty)

If your business provides consumer loans, vendor finance or credit assistance, this case is a strong reminder to check the legal character of what you are doing...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 454

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v HCF Life Insurance Company Pty Limited (Penalty)

For businesses, the main lesson is to test customer-facing wording against the law that actually governs the product, not just against the text of the contract. If...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1667

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v iSignthis Limited (Costs)

Business owners should read this case as a reminder that costs are a major part of litigation exposure. If a regulator or other claimant succeeds on the main case,...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 917

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v iSignthis Limited (Penalty)

The main lesson is that listed-company disclosure problems often arise from delay, incomplete explanations and overconfidence that an issue can be managed...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1158

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macrolend Pty Ltd (No 3)

A business cannot avoid financial services regulation by describing an investment as a loan or promissory note if, in substance, the arrangement is a debenture, a...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1086

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Money3 Loans Pty Ltd (No 3)

The practical message for business owners is that responsible lending compliance is built file by file. If your business lends to consumers, the court's attention...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1038

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Open4Sale Global Ltd (No 2)

If your company is offering shares in Australia, do not assume fundraising compliance can be fixed later. This case involved admitted breaches of section 727(6)...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1087

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RAMS Financial Group Pty Ltd

Read this case as a warning about both procedure and compliance. On procedure, a business affected by a regulator case may still be shut out if it cannot show the...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1304

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v RAMS Financial Group Pty Ltd (Penalty)

Business owners should read this case as a governance and operating-model decision, not just a referral-law decision. RAMS had a franchise-based credit distribution...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 959

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v TerraCom Limited (No 2)

If your business, directors or senior staff are defending a regulator claim, do not assume that winning means the other side will reimburse most of your legal costs...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 407

Australian Steel Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Selection Steel Trading Pty Ltd

Business owners should read this as a contract management case as much as an insolvency case. If you want your standard terms to govern future trading, make that...

Read explainer
Privacy & Data
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1658

AxiCorp Financial Services Pty Ltd v CABC (No 3)

If your business is in litigation, do not assume a settlement deed can clean up the court file after the event. This case shows the court may permit documents to be...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1060

Bain v International Capital Markets Pty Ltd (No 4)

Business owners should read this as a data minimisation case as much as a privacy case. The Court did not decide the merits of the underlying class action. It...

Read explainer
Privacy & Data
Federal Court of Australia - Full Court[2025] FCAFC 144

Bakers Delight Holdings Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman

For business owners, the plain English point is this: missing payroll records can change who has to prove what in court. Under s 557C, if an employer was required...

Read explainer
Employment & Workplace
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1030

BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (Amendment and Strikeout)

The practical message is that pleadings, particulars and expert evidence must work together from an early stage. A business cannot safely assume that an expert...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 616

BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (Review of Registrar’s Decision)

If your business is in a court dispute, this case is a reminder to get the pleading right early. You need to state the material facts clearly enough to give fair...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1535

BDR21 v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3)

Read this case as a warning against casual reuse of litigation documents. The Court did not give a general right to repurpose discovered material. It granted a...

Read explainer
Privacy & Data
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 683

Bickford’s Australia Pty Ltd v Trink Tank Pty Ltd

Treat court selection, timing and claim structure as part of your substantive brand strategy, not as an afterthought. In this case, the real commercial fight about...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1189

Bilal v Ampol Limited

Business owners should read this as a procedure-heavy but very practical case. It does not say whistleblower claims are weak. It says they must be pleaded and...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1190

Bilal v EML NSW Limited

If your business is sued over whistleblower protections, workplace rights representations or alleged personal involvement by managers, start with two separate...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia - Full Court[2025] FCAFC 118

BlueScope Steel Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Businesses should read this case as a warning about pricing communications that go beyond announcing your own prices and move into trying to shape how others price...

Read explainer
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1647

Bowcher (liquidator), in the matter of Blacktrans Express Pty Ltd (in liq) v Black

If your company enters liquidation, do not treat company books, passwords, keys, vehicles, trailers, plant or records as if they remain yours to hold back, sort out...

Read explainer
Privacy & Data
Federal Court of Australia[2025] FCA 1225

Butler v Total Tools Holdings Pty Ltd

If your business wants to reward a director, executive or adviser with equity on a future sale or IPO, use a full written incentive agreement and make the corporate...

Read explainer