Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
If you create or distribute financial products in Australia, the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) set a clear expectation: design products that meet the needs of a clearly defined market, then distribute them in a way that’s consistent with those needs.
In practice, this means documenting a Target Market Determination (TMD), putting robust distribution controls in place, monitoring outcomes and complaints, and taking corrective action when things aren’t working as intended.
It’s a serious compliance regime with real consequences, but it’s also a practical framework for better product governance. In this guide, we’ll walk through what DDO requires, who it applies to, and how to build a simple, repeatable compliance process for your business.
Keep in mind that DDO sits alongside other laws, including your Australian Consumer Law (ACL) obligations around fair marketing and avoiding misleading or deceptive conduct. If your product is promoted to retail clients, ensure your advertising is consistent with Section 18 (misleading or deceptive conduct) and related rules.
What Are ASIC’s Design and Distribution Obligations?
DDO is a product governance regime under the Corporations Act, administered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). It applies to issuers and distributors of financial products to retail clients.
The core idea is straightforward: don’t design or sell products to people for whom they are not appropriate. To achieve this, issuers must:
- Create and publish a Target Market Determination (TMD) that clearly identifies the intended retail market, key attributes, and distribution conditions.
- Take reasonable steps to ensure distribution is consistent with the TMD (through controls, training and oversight).
- Collect and review key data (including complaints and significant dealings) and periodically review the TMD.
- Cease distribution and review the TMD if certain triggers occur, and notify ASIC of any “significant dealings” that are inconsistent with the TMD.
- Maintain records that evidence the steps you took to comply.
Distributors also have obligations, including taking reasonable steps to distribute consistently with the TMD, collecting information specified by the issuer, and reporting significant dealings.
Who Must Comply In Australia?
DDO typically applies if you issue or distribute financial products to retail clients, such as interests in managed investment schemes, certain credit products, insurance, superannuation and many more.
Broadly speaking:
- Issuers (the entity responsible for preparing the Product Disclosure Statement) must prepare the TMD and set the governance framework.
- Distributors (including advisers, platforms, comparison sites and other intermediaries) must follow the TMD and report to the issuer.
There are exclusions and product-specific nuances, so it’s wise to map your product suite, identify which products are in scope, and clarify the issuer versus distributor roles for each distribution channel.
If you operate multiple brands, white-label products, or use third-party distributors, define responsibilities in writing. Your commercial terms should reflect DDO data-sharing and reporting requirements - for example, adding suitable controls into your Terms of Trade with distribution partners.
Step-By-Step: Building Your DDO Compliance Framework
You don’t need a mountain of paperwork to comply. Focus on a lean, repeatable process that fits your business model. Here’s a practical approach.
1) Understand Your Product And Customers
- Document the product’s objectives, key attributes, features and risks.
- Identify who the product is suitable for - and who it isn’t. Be concrete about needs, financial situation and objectives.
- Map real distribution channels: direct online, through advisers, via platforms, or through affiliates.
This analysis forms the foundation of your TMD and justifies your distribution conditions.
2) Draft A Target Market Determination (TMD)
- Define the target market in plain language (demographics, needs, experience and financial capacity as relevant).
- Set distribution conditions (for example, only via trained advisers, online self-serve with scalability limits, or additional screening for certain cohorts).
- Specify review triggers (e.g. spike in complaints, product changes, regulatory action, or adverse performance trends).
- Set reporting requirements for distributors (complaints, significant dealings, sales data, or other indicators).
- Assign a review period (for example, every 12 months), plus earlier review if a trigger occurs.
Make sure the TMD is accessible and current. If you distribute online, ensure your Website Terms of Use and sales journey reflect any distribution conditions, disclosures and eligibility steps.
3) Implement Distribution Controls And Training
- Build controls into sales funnels (e.g. eligibility questions, warnings or hard stops where criteria aren’t met).
- Train staff and partners on the TMD and “reasonable steps” obligations.
- Set up data capture for complaints, post-sale outcomes and distributor reporting.
The controls should be proportionate to the product’s complexity and risk. Higher risk products generally require stronger controls and oversight.
4) Monitor, Review And Remediate
- Monitor complaints and distributor reports, and escalate emerging issues quickly.
- Conduct periodic reviews against your TMD review cycle.
- Pause or restrict distribution if review triggers are met, amend the TMD if needed, and notify ASIC of any significant dealings.
Your aim is continuous improvement: refine the target market and controls based on real-world outcomes.
5) Record-Keeping
- Keep records that demonstrate your reasonable steps: training materials, sales controls, reports, meeting notes, and TMD versions.
- Retain data in line with your privacy and retention policies. Robust records support your position with regulators and improve internal decision-making.
Good documentation is crucial. Consider how your retention practices align with data retention laws in Australia, and ensure your Privacy Policy properly covers the way you collect and use customer data for compliance purposes.
Ongoing Obligations: Distribution, Monitoring, Reviews And Notifications
Once your framework is in place, day-to-day compliance comes down to discipline and clarity across your teams and partners.
Distribution Consistent With The TMD
Issuers must take reasonable steps to ensure distribution occurs in line with the TMD. Distributors must also take reasonable steps and follow any conditions or screening built into the TMD.
Ask yourself: would a reasonable person expect your controls to prevent sales to customers outside the target market most of the time? If not, strengthen your checks, training or oversight.
Monitoring Complaints And Outcomes
Complaints are a core data source under DDO. Make sure complaints are categorised correctly and shared with the issuer within the timeframes set in the TMD. Patterns (e.g. repeated suitability concerns) should trigger deeper review.
If you sell online, align your customer journey and post-sale communications with the TMD, and support it with clear customer-facing documents like Terms of Trade and appropriate disclosures.
Review Triggers And TMD Updates
Your TMD should set specific triggers for early review, such as a product change, a spike in complaints, regulatory developments or adverse performance data. When a trigger is met, pause and reassess whether your target market or distribution conditions are still right.
Significant Dealings Notifications
If there’s a “significant dealing” outside the TMD, issuers must notify ASIC within the required timeframe. Distributors have corresponding reporting duties to issuers. Define “significant” in your procedures and train staff on escalation so nothing falls through the cracks.
Records, Enforcement And Common Pitfalls
ASIC expects to see evidence of your “reasonable steps” - not just a well-written TMD. Keep a single source of truth for TMD versions, reviews, training logs, distributor reports and decisions taken in response to issues.
Common pitfalls include:
- Vague target markets that don’t clearly exclude unsuitable consumers.
- Controls that exist on paper only (no real eligibility checks, or they’re easy to bypass).
- Insufficient data-sharing between issuers and distributors; reporting duties need to be built into contracts and systems.
- Static TMDs that aren’t updated when triggers occur or when real-world outcomes indicate a mismatch.
- Marketing misalignment - promotions promising outcomes inconsistent with the TMD or product risks, raising issues under DDO and the ACL (for example, claims that could contravene misleading or deceptive conduct rules).
If you’re unsure whether your settings meet the “reasonable steps” test, it’s sensible to get tailored guidance from a regulatory compliance lawyer, particularly before launching a new product or channel.
Key Legal Documents For DDO Compliance
Your compliance framework will rely on a short set of practical documents and policies. Depending on your product and channels, consider the following:
- Target Market Determination (TMD): The core DDO document defining the target market, distribution conditions, review triggers and reporting requirements.
- Distribution Agreements / Terms: Commercial terms with partners should embed TMD-aligned controls and reporting obligations; many businesses use tailored Terms of Trade to set these expectations.
- Website Terms Of Use: If you distribute online, your Website Terms of Use should align with eligibility checks, disclosures and any restrictions in the TMD.
- Privacy Policy: DDO requires data flows between issuers and distributors; your Privacy Policy and internal practices should lawfully cover collection, use and sharing of personal information for compliance monitoring.
- Complaints Handling Procedure: A simple internal procedure that routes complaints data to the right people and ensures timely reporting to issuers in line with the TMD.
- Training Materials: Short, role-specific training for staff and distributors covering the TMD, distribution conditions, review triggers and escalation steps.
- Marketing Sign-Off Protocol: A lightweight process to check promotions align with the TMD and ACL, with access to expert support such as an ACL consultation package for complex campaigns.
If you also operate in adjacent areas like e-commerce or software platforms, it’s worth ensuring your customer journey and documents are consistent with the DDO framework and broader consumer protections. For more complex product suites or multi-channel distribution, consider a brief legal advice package to check your settings before launch.
Key Takeaways
- DDO requires issuers and distributors to design and sell financial products to a clearly defined target market - and to prove it through real controls, monitoring and reviews.
- A strong TMD is essential: set a clear target market, define distribution conditions, specify review triggers and outline distributor reporting.
- Reasonable steps include practical sales controls, staff training, data collection, and timely action on complaints, review triggers and significant dealings.
- Keep robust records to evidence compliance, and make sure contracts with distributors embed DDO reporting and controls.
- Align your marketing and online customer journey with the TMD and the ACL, supported by the right customer-facing documents like Website Terms of Use and a Privacy Policy.
- Getting targeted regulatory guidance early can help you tailor a lean, effective DDO framework that scales as you grow.
If you’d like a consultation on complying with ASIC’s Design and Distribution Obligations, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no-obligations chat.
Business legal next step
When should you speak to a lawyer?
Government registers are useful, but they do not always cover the contracts, ownership terms and risk settings around the business decision.








