Business Law Library & Tracker
Selected Business Law Cases
Short explainers for court decisions that change how Australian businesses handle contracts, staff, customers, IP and company duties.
Sources last reviewed 8 June 2026
Main law guides
297
Acts, regulations and codes worth reading first
Topics
22
Plain-English clusters
Published case explainers
496
Selected cases with a business lesson
Tracked updates
110
New, amended & reviewed
Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.
Get legal helpSMBC Leasing and Finance v Flexirent Capital
When finance documents say receivables, assets or customer contracts exist, those warranties are not decorative. If the underlying transaction is fake, the business...
SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc. v Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd (Costs)
If your business is in a serious contract dispute, do not treat mitigation, settlement and costs as separate topics. They interact. This judgment shows that...
SMBC Leasing and Finance, Inc. v Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd (Lump Sum Costs)
If your business is in serious litigation, manage costs with recoverability in mind from the start. This case shows that the Court may prefer a practical lump sum...
South32 v Siemens discovery dispute
If your business uses related companies, overseas specialists, shared personnel or subcontractors to deliver a project, do not assume their records sit outside your...
Southernwood v Brambles
Investor updates and forecasts need to match the internal evidence. For listed companies and scale-ups preparing for public markets, management accounts, board...
Sozou, in the matter of Comm TC
Poor company records and unexplained related-party payments do not disappear when a company goes into liquidation. They can give liquidators more reason to seek...
Sozou, in the matter of SSG NSW
Businesses paid by a customer that later enters liquidation should not assume an unfair preference claim will arrive as a standalone case. Liquidators may try to...
Sphere Healthcare v Allianz
Insurance disclosure is an operating discipline, not admin. When a business changes what it makes, stores dangerous goods differently or changes brokers during a...
Sunflower Care Services Pty Ltd v Commissioner of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (Costs)
If your business is challenging a regulator, this case shows that the usual idea that the winner gets costs is only a starting point. The court focused on the...
Svehla v Svager
Consumer law disputes can turn on details that feel ordinary at the time: who supplied the goods, whether they were supplied in trade or commerce, what was said...
TEQSA v Chegg
Regulated digital services need product controls, not just terms of use. If a platform enables users to buy help that crosses into prohibited conduct, overseas...
The NOCO Company v Brown and Watson
Patent protection only works if the claims, priority story and best-method disclosure are disciplined. Product businesses should not assume broad later patent...
The Owners - Strata Plan No 87231 v 3A Composites
Product and building-safety disputes are rarely won by pointing at a product category in the abstract. If a business wants to rely on a product claim, warning claim...
The Owners - Strata Plan No 87231 v 3A Composites GmbH (No 11)
The practical takeaway is that this is a procedural judgment with real downstream value, not a new statement of substantive Australian Consumer Law doctrine. If...
The Property Mentors Australia v Touch for Health
Investment documents should never promise timing or returns unless the numbers have a defensible basis in the actual trust deed, project documents and commercial...
TJ & P Pty Ltd as trustee for the Post Family Trust v Agrinova Pty Ltd
If your business is discussing a rescue transaction, acquisition, refinance, settlement or debt clean-up, do not assume that avoiding a final signed contract...
Top Energy Holdings v Liu
Joint ventures, sale documents and shareholder funding records need a clean paper trail. If a document is created or relied on after the relationship breaks down,...
Toro Energy scheme meeting
A scheme of arrangement is not just deal paperwork. It is a disclosure, timetable and governance process. Founders and boards planning an exit should treat bidder...
Trafalgar Group v Boss Fire
A trade mark can survive even when it is used inside a larger composite brand, but only if the evidence shows real trade mark use. Businesses should keep product,...
True EV Distribution Pty Ltd v Shenzhen Xiaopeng Motors Supply Chain Management Co Ltd
The key lesson is to separate merits from interim relief. A court may accept that there is a serious question to be tried and still refuse an interlocutory...
True EV Distribution v Shenzhen Xiaopeng Motors
A commercial claim can be commercially real but still stall if the plaintiff cannot provide security for the other side's costs. Before starting major litigation,...
Trueline Kerbing SA Pty Ltd v Administrative Incentivised Management Systems Pty Ltd
Read this as a pleading decision, not a final liability ruling. The Court accepted the applicants’ allegations at face value only for the limited purpose of...
Turner v Chandler Macleod costs
The Fair Work jurisdiction is usually protective on costs, but it is not a free pass for hopeless relitigation. Settlement deeds and releases should be drafted...
Turner v Chandler Macleod Group
Employment settlements and releases need careful scope, records and advice notes. Once a worker has settled earlier employment, injury or entitlement claims, later...
Ugle v South West Aboriginal Medical Service
Company governance orders can affect what directors say to members before a meeting. If the company is in litigation, AGM communications, proxy procedures and...
Ugle v South West Aboriginal Medical Service
Member organisations and charities can face oppression orders when governance is used to entrench control or exclude dissent. Procedural fairness, valid expulsions,...
UIL (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Wollongong Coal Limited (No 4)
Treat written submissions in Federal Court litigation as potentially public-facing documents if they are going to be relied on in open court. This case draws an...
United Petroleum v Perth Airport
Future-looking statements in tenders, brochures and deal meetings need evidence. If a business is selling a commercial opportunity based on expected traffic,...
v2food patent opposition appeal
A patent opposition can turn on who actually carries evidence into court. If the opponent does not support its grounds on a fresh appeal, the patent applicant may...
Verma v Coles Supermarkets Australia
Employment disputes can be won or lost before the final hearing if the claims do not line up with the right tribunal steps, certificates and complaint history....
Vinall v Bank of Western Australia Limited trading as Bankwest (No 2)
If your business needs confidentiality in Federal Court litigation, treat it as a serious, evidence-based application from the start. This decision shows that the...
Vinall v Bankwest
Credit providers should treat hardship reporting as a controlled legal and customer process. If hardship information may be reported to a credit reporting body, the...
Wang v Creation Homes QLD
Construction disputes are won on the contract, payment notices, dates and records. AI-polished pleadings or dramatic allegations will not replace evidence about...
Watski v Roughstone
A lease assignment can block a business sale if landlord consent is not handled early. Tenants selling a business should check the lease, gather buyer and lender...
White, in the matter of Profounder Turfmaster
A liquidation can need external funding before creditors see any recovery. Where a liquidator wants to enter a funding agreement or legal retainer that will run for...
Wijaya v Matthews Brothers Engineering Pty Ltd
Business owners should read this case as a pleading decision, not as a broad approval of abrupt probationary dismissals. The Court did not decide that the...