Sapna is a content writer at Sprintlaw. She has completed a Bachelor of Laws with a Bachelor of Arts. Since graduating, she has worked primarily in the field of legal research and writing, and now helps Sprintlaw assist small businesses.
- What Changed Under The Designs Act - And Why It Matters
Common Scenarios And How The New Rules Apply
- “We Showed Our Prototype At A Trade Fair - Is It Too Late?”
- “A Supplier Started Selling A Look‑Alike After Our Public Demo”
- “We Gave A Distributor An Exclusive Territory - Who Can Sue?”
- “We Sell After‑Market Parts For Repairs - Are We Safe?”
- “Our Product Look Is Strong - Should We Also Protect The Brand?”
- Designs Vs Other IP Rights: How They Work Together
- Key Takeaways
Australia’s design law has had a significant refresh. If you create or commercialise product designs - from furniture and packaging to fashion and consumer tech - the recent changes to the Designs Act 2003 (Cth) affect how you file, enforce and share your designs.
In this guide, we’ll walk through what’s changed, why it matters in practice, and the simple steps you can take now to protect your IP while staying compliant. The goal is to make these updates easy to understand so you can keep innovating with confidence.
We’re here to help you navigate the legal steps so you can focus on building what’s next.
What Changed Under The Designs Act - And Why It Matters
The latest amendments modernise Australia’s design regime and bring it closer to other major jurisdictions. At a high level, the reforms:
- Introduce a 12‑month “grace period” so certain pre‑filing disclosures by the designer/owner won’t destroy newness; this reduces the risk of losing protection just because you talked about or displayed your design too early.
- Add a “prior use” defence so someone who genuinely started using a design during that grace period (before you filed) may have limited rights to keep using it.
- Allow exclusive licensees to sue for infringement, improving enforcement options for brand owners and commercial partners.
- Simplify parts of the registration and publication process, making timelines more predictable from filing to publication.
- Clarify and expand certain defences (including limited relief for “innocent” infringers and a repair defence for component parts in specific circumstances).
Together, these changes make it safer to prototype, market-test or pitch your design before filing - but only if you understand the boundaries and lodge your application within the deadlines. They also tighten how disputes are handled once your design is registered.
How The 12‑Month Grace Period Works
One of the most important updates is the new 12‑month grace period. In simple terms, if you (or someone who derived the information from you) disclose your design before filing, that disclosure won’t necessarily ruin your ability to register - as long as you file within 12 months of that first disclosure.
What counts as a “disclosure”?
Disclosure can be almost any public act that reveals the appearance of your product: launching at a trade show, posting on your website or socials, sending sales decks to retailers, or showing investors a working sample. With the grace period, these actions may no longer be fatal to registration - but you still need to track dates carefully.
What’s not covered?
The grace period isn’t a blanket shield. Not all third‑party disclosures are covered, and the details can be nuanced. For example, disclosures by independent third parties (unconnected to you) still form part of the prior art base and can affect validity. The safest strategy remains to file before you disclose where possible.
Why timing still matters
If you disclose today, your 12‑month clock starts now. If you miss that window, your own disclosure can still destroy newness. To lock in protection while you explore partners or run pilots, consider filing a design application sooner rather than later. If you’d like support with timing and filing strategy, our team can help with a Registered Design Application.
New Defences And Enforcement Changes
The reforms also adjust how infringement risks and enforcement play out in practice. Here are the key updates you should know about.
Prior Use Defence
If someone independently starts using your design after your grace‑period disclosure but before you file, they may gain a limited right to continue that use. This balances fairness where a public disclosure suggested the design was available, and it’s a reminder to file promptly to minimise this scenario.
Exclusive Licensees Can Sue
Previously, only the registered owner could bring infringement proceedings. Now, an exclusive licensee can also commence action in their own name. This is a practical boost where a commercial partner holds exclusive rights for a product category or territory. If you grant exclusivity, make sure your agreement clearly sets out enforcement responsibilities and cost sharing - an IP Licence tailored to your arrangement can help avoid confusion later.
Innocent Infringer Relief
There’s additional protection for “innocent” infringers in certain circumstances (for example, where a person couldn’t reasonably have known a design was registered at the time of their acts). This doesn’t make infringement lawful, but it can affect the remedies available. From a practical perspective, it reinforces why recording and notifying key dates - such as when a design becomes published - is important for asserting your rights effectively.
Repair Defence For Component Parts
The amendments also support a repair defence in defined situations. In short, using a component part to repair a “complex product” so it restores the product’s overall appearance may be protected from infringement claims, subject to conditions. This is especially relevant for spare parts industries and after-market suppliers.
Registration And Publication Process Improvements
There are procedural tweaks to make the path from filing to registration and publication clearer and more efficient. The exact mechanics depend on your filing strategy (for example, whether you want early or deferred publication). The big takeaway is to plan your timing around launches, investor discussions and supply deals. A well‑timed application can give you protection when you need it, without undermining your commercial milestones.
Practical Steps To Protect Your Designs Under The New Rules
The reforms are pro‑innovation, but you still need a plan. Here’s a simple, practical roadmap you can follow.
1) Map Your Design Timeline
- List key dates: prototype completion, investor pitches, trade shows, pilot runs, marketing content, website go‑live and retail launches.
- Identify any disclosures you’ve already made. If you have disclosed, estimate when the 12‑month clock started.
- Set a target filing date well within that window to reduce risk.
2) File Early Where You Can
Filing before disclosure is still the gold standard. If a launch is imminent, speak with a lawyer about filing now and managing publication to suit your plans. If you’re ready to proceed, our team can handle a Registered Design Application end‑to‑end.
3) Use NDAs For Pre‑Launch Discussions
While the grace period is helpful, it’s smart to keep pre‑filing conversations confidential. A concise Non‑Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with manufacturers, investors or retailers can minimise leaks and reduce disputes about who disclosed what and when.
4) Align Your Brand Protection
Your visual brand and product design are different IP rights. Register your product’s appearance as a design and protect your name or logo as a trade mark. Doing both gives you broader coverage. If you’re ready to secure the brand side, consider a Trade Mark in parallel with your design filing.
5) Get Your Commercial Contracts In Order
- IP Licence: If you license production or distribution, set clear scope, fees, exclusivity, quality control and enforcement rights.
- IP Assignment: Use this when ownership must transfer (e.g. from a contractor or supplier to your company) so the registered owner matches your commercial reality.
- Manufacturing and supply agreements: Lock in confidentiality, tooling ownership, and defect/recall processes to protect design integrity and timelines.
6) Keep Clean Records
Document your design evolution, disclosure dates, who saw what and when, and your filing history. If enforcement is ever needed, a clean paper trail can be decisive - especially given the new grace and prior‑use settings.
7) Review Your IP Strategy As You Scale
If you expand to new markets, consider international filings and how local grace periods differ. It’s best to get tailored advice from an Intellectual Property Lawyer before you launch in each country.
Common Scenarios And How The New Rules Apply
“We Showed Our Prototype At A Trade Fair - Is It Too Late?”
Not necessarily. Thanks to the grace period, you may still be able to register the design if you file within 12 months of that disclosure. Move quickly, gather evidence of the disclosure date, and plan your application now.
“A Supplier Started Selling A Look‑Alike After Our Public Demo”
If the supplier genuinely started using the design after your disclosure but before your filing, they may argue a prior‑use defence for limited ongoing use. It’s another reason to file as early as possible and to use NDAs when discussing pre‑launch samples.
“We Gave A Distributor An Exclusive Territory - Who Can Sue?”
With the reforms, an exclusive licensee can sue for infringement in their own name. Your exclusive distribution or licensing agreement should make enforcement responsibilities clear (including cooperation, strategy and cost‑sharing). Consider whether your existing IP Licence terms need an update to reflect the new enforcement options.
“We Sell After‑Market Parts For Repairs - Are We Safe?”
The repair defence may apply when a component is used to repair a complex product so that it restores the overall appearance, subject to conditions. It’s a technical area, so get advice before relying on it, and make sure your marketing stays within the “repair” narrative rather than suggesting a whole‑of‑product redesign.
“Our Product Look Is Strong - Should We Also Protect The Brand?”
Absolutely. A registered design protects the product’s visual features, while a trade mark guards the brand identity customers recognise. Many businesses register both a design and a Trade Mark to create layered protection.
Designs Vs Other IP Rights: How They Work Together
It helps to view your IP as a toolkit rather than a single instrument. In practice:
- Designs protect the visual features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornamentation of a product.
- Trade marks protect distinctive signs that indicate origin (names, logos, taglines).
- Copyright may protect original artwork and certain design drawings (separate from product design protection).
- Contracts (NDAs, licences, assignments, manufacturing agreements) control how others can use your IP.
The recent reforms strengthen the design piece of this toolkit. Your strategy should combine registrations with strong agreements and clear internal processes.
Key Takeaways
- The Designs Act reforms introduce a 12‑month grace period for certain disclosures by or derived from the designer/owner - helpful if you’ve already shown your design, but you must file within the window.
- There’s a new prior‑use defence for third parties who started using a design during that grace period before filing, which is another reason to file early.
- Exclusive licensees can now sue for infringement, so review any exclusivity arrangements and make sure your IP Licence matches your enforcement strategy.
- Procedural changes streamline registration and publication; plan your filing to align with launch and disclosure milestones.
- Use practical tools - a Non‑Disclosure Agreement, timely design filing, and the right IP Assignment/IP Licence - to strengthen protection and reduce disputes.
- Combine design protection with a Trade Mark for layered brand and product coverage.
If you’d like a consultation on protecting your designs under the updated law, you can reach us at 1800 730 617 or team@sprintlaw.com.au for a free, no‑obligations chat.








